Publication Cover
Advances in Applied Ceramics
Structural, Functional and Bioceramics
Volume 117, 2018 - Issue sup1: UHTC IV
1,421
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Oxidation response of a SiCf/SiC CMC with a HfB2-based coating in an arc jet test

, ORCID Icon, , , , , , ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages s19-s25 | Received 29 Nov 2017, Accepted 01 Aug 2018, Published online: 19 Nov 2018

Figures & data

Table 1. Arc jet conditions: measured data.

Table 2. Arc jet conditions: derived data.

Table 3. Pyrometer details.

Figure 1. (a) Overview of the as processed SiC/SiC-HfB2 composite. (b) Magnified image of the surface showing the HfB2-SiC and SiC phases in the matrix.

Figure 1. (a) Overview of the as processed SiC/SiC-HfB2 composite. (b) Magnified image of the surface showing the HfB2-SiC and SiC phases in the matrix.

Figure 2. Temperature versus time plot for the four tested samples. The solid lines are the P800 pyrometer and the dotted lines of the corresponding color are the M1000 pyrometer readings. The locations marked SC are where the P800 was switched form dual-colour to single-color mode. The inset images show the surface of the samples after arc jet exposure for each disk.

Figure 2. Temperature versus time plot for the four tested samples. The solid lines are the P800 pyrometer and the dotted lines of the corresponding color are the M1000 pyrometer readings. The locations marked SC are where the P800 was switched form dual-colour to single-color mode. The inset images show the surface of the samples after arc jet exposure for each disk.

Figure 3. Calculated spectral emissivity at about 1 µm for the considered angle of view (60°) versus temperature measured for Disk I, Disk II and Disk IV. No measurements were taken on Disk III.

Figure 3. Calculated spectral emissivity at about 1 µm for the considered angle of view (60°) versus temperature measured for Disk I, Disk II and Disk IV. No measurements were taken on Disk III.

Figure 4. (a) Secondary electron image of the surface of Disk II after arc jet exposure. From the EDS maps for (b) Hf, (c) O and (d) Si, it is shown that there is a thin SiO2-HfO2 layer at the surface which is shown for Disk III in (e). The oxide scale is less than 10 µm and consists of SiO2 (dark phase) and HfO2 (light phase).

Figure 4. (a) Secondary electron image of the surface of Disk II after arc jet exposure. From the EDS maps for (b) Hf, (c) O and (d) Si, it is shown that there is a thin SiO2-HfO2 layer at the surface which is shown for Disk III in (e). The oxide scale is less than 10 µm and consists of SiO2 (dark phase) and HfO2 (light phase).

Figure 5. (a) Overview of the oxide scale formed on Disk IV after arc jet exposure. The oxide scale forms three distinct layers 1: porous HfO2; 2: SiC-depleted HfB2 and 3: HfB2-SiC. (b) Surface of the oxide scale. (c) Magnified image of the three layers. SiO2 is not found at the surface in (a), but can be found in some instances as shown in (d).

Figure 5. (a) Overview of the oxide scale formed on Disk IV after arc jet exposure. The oxide scale forms three distinct layers 1: porous HfO2; 2: SiC-depleted HfB2 and 3: HfB2-SiC. (b) Surface of the oxide scale. (c) Magnified image of the three layers. SiO2 is not found at the surface in (a), but can be found in some instances as shown in (d).

Figure 6. EDS map showing the removal of SiO2 in the outer layer and depletion of SiC from layer 2. Oxygen signal is associated with HfO2.

Figure 6. EDS map showing the removal of SiO2 in the outer layer and depletion of SiC from layer 2. Oxygen signal is associated with HfO2.