Figures & data
Figure 1. (a) DTM of Pozzuoli Bay. Projection is UTM (33); Datum is WGS84. (Lakes: AL = Averno, LL = Lucrino; Craters: MN = Monte Nuovo, GA = Gauro; AS = Astroni; CI = Cigliano; SO = Solfatara; AG = Agnano; AS = Astroni); Inset (b) Archaeological remains in the marine sector in front of Baia (VdP = Villa dei Pisoni; BeC = Baianus Lacus entry channel); Inset (c) Archaeological remains in the marine sector in front of Pozzuoli (PI = Portus Iulius; PIEC = Portus Iulius Entry Channel).
![Figure 1. (a) DTM of Pozzuoli Bay. Projection is UTM (33); Datum is WGS84. (Lakes: AL = Averno, LL = Lucrino; Craters: MN = Monte Nuovo, GA = Gauro; AS = Astroni; CI = Cigliano; SO = Solfatara; AG = Agnano; AS = Astroni); Inset (b) Archaeological remains in the marine sector in front of Baia (VdP = Villa dei Pisoni; BeC = Baianus Lacus entry channel); Inset (c) Archaeological remains in the marine sector in front of Pozzuoli (PI = Portus Iulius; PIEC = Portus Iulius Entry Channel).](/cms/asset/7bdfff47-36a0-4b5b-851c-0604ccd8947b/tjom_a_1001800_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. (a) Slope map; (b) Aspect map; (c) Seafloor DEM sample displaying apparent rugged-shaped, ripple-like morphology, actually due to an artefact (fake seafloor undulations aligned along swath, perpendicular to the ship heading); (d) bathymetric profile P1–P2 showing shape and magnitude of ripple-like noise.
![Figure 2. (a) Slope map; (b) Aspect map; (c) Seafloor DEM sample displaying apparent rugged-shaped, ripple-like morphology, actually due to an artefact (fake seafloor undulations aligned along swath, perpendicular to the ship heading); (d) bathymetric profile P1–P2 showing shape and magnitude of ripple-like noise.](/cms/asset/4d9a322f-fea8-4b87-ac10-7774ce93a3f4/tjom_a_1001800_f0002_c.jpg)