Figures & data
Figure 2. Reference descriptions for the weathering classes (modified from CitationBorrelli et al., in press).
![Figure 2. Reference descriptions for the weathering classes (modified from CitationBorrelli et al., in press).](/cms/asset/fd949ed0-675a-4873-8885-6b92cfd3494a/tjom_a_1010742_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. Data collection from observations and measurements at the checkpoints for each cut slope surveyed (modified from CitationGullà & Matano, 1997).
![Figure 3. Data collection from observations and measurements at the checkpoints for each cut slope surveyed (modified from CitationGullà & Matano, 1997).](/cms/asset/96346dbc-92e2-4b5a-b5da-7d9e0a5e0763/tjom_a_1010742_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 5. Geo-structural map of the study area: (a) panoramic view of the San Giovanni in Fiore town; (b) Upper Pliocene–Middle Pleistocene clastic deposits; (c) granitoid rocks (Palaeozoic). Notes: (1) alluvial deposits; (2) Upper Pliocene–Middle Pleistocene alternating sands and conglomerates; (3) granitoid rocks with mainly granitoid composition (Palaeozoic); (4) normal fault; (5) left-lateral transcurrent fault reactivated as normal fault; (6) fault with undetermined kinematics; (7) low-angle thrust.
![Figure 5. Geo-structural map of the study area: (a) panoramic view of the San Giovanni in Fiore town; (b) Upper Pliocene–Middle Pleistocene clastic deposits; (c) granitoid rocks (Palaeozoic). Notes: (1) alluvial deposits; (2) Upper Pliocene–Middle Pleistocene alternating sands and conglomerates; (3) granitoid rocks with mainly granitoid composition (Palaeozoic); (4) normal fault; (5) left-lateral transcurrent fault reactivated as normal fault; (6) fault with undetermined kinematics; (7) low-angle thrust.](/cms/asset/02420c31-fd95-48f0-a6bd-8f2c366fd083/tjom_a_1010742_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6. Examples of faults surveyed in the study area at the macro- and meso-scale: (a) panoramic view of the right slope of the Arvo river and some faults related to the main fault systems; (b) N–S transpressive faults; (c) N–S right-lateral transpressive faults; (d) last kinematics on the N–S fault plane in the Pleistocene conglomerates; (e) left-lateral striae on the NW–SE fault plane; (f) ancient overthrust; (g) NW–SE fault zone with associated thick fault gouge.
![Figure 6. Examples of faults surveyed in the study area at the macro- and meso-scale: (a) panoramic view of the right slope of the Arvo river and some faults related to the main fault systems; (b) N–S transpressive faults; (c) N–S right-lateral transpressive faults; (d) last kinematics on the N–S fault plane in the Pleistocene conglomerates; (e) left-lateral striae on the NW–SE fault plane; (f) ancient overthrust; (g) NW–SE fault zone with associated thick fault gouge.](/cms/asset/3c0e7533-2bd9-460b-9f45-981778be472d/tjom_a_1010742_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 7. Weathering grade and geotectonic map of the study area. Notes: (1) alluvial deposits; (2) conglomerates and relative covers; (3) class VI; (4); class V; (5) class IV; (6) class III; (7) normal fault; (8) left-lateral transcurrent fault reactivated as normal fault; (9) fault with undetermined kinematics; (10) uncertain thrust; (11) studied weathering profiles; (12) samples collected for the petrographic analyses.
![Figure 7. Weathering grade and geotectonic map of the study area. Notes: (1) alluvial deposits; (2) conglomerates and relative covers; (3) class VI; (4); class V; (5) class IV; (6) class III; (7) normal fault; (8) left-lateral transcurrent fault reactivated as normal fault; (9) fault with undetermined kinematics; (10) uncertain thrust; (11) studied weathering profiles; (12) samples collected for the petrographic analyses.](/cms/asset/ecffe1d3-66fb-4dc2-b801-0ce9020b1b98/tjom_a_1010742_f0007_c.jpg)
Figure 8. Schematic weathering profile reconstructed by the cut slopes survey: (a and b) corestones outcropping on the ground surface near Mt. Ferolia and near Marinella area, above 1100 m a.s.l.; (c) examples of aplitic dike of class III immersed in class V, generally widespread above 1000 m a.s.l.; (d) typical features of the cut slopes observed between 1360 and 1050 m a.s.l; (e–g) typical features of the cut slopes observed (e) from 1050 to 1000 m a.s.l, (f) from 1000 to 930 m a.s.l, (g) from 930 to 783 m a.s.l.
![Figure 8. Schematic weathering profile reconstructed by the cut slopes survey: (a and b) corestones outcropping on the ground surface near Mt. Ferolia and near Marinella area, above 1100 m a.s.l.; (c) examples of aplitic dike of class III immersed in class V, generally widespread above 1000 m a.s.l.; (d) typical features of the cut slopes observed between 1360 and 1050 m a.s.l; (e–g) typical features of the cut slopes observed (e) from 1050 to 1000 m a.s.l, (f) from 1000 to 930 m a.s.l, (g) from 930 to 783 m a.s.l.](/cms/asset/b81768bf-d598-43a2-b37a-dd4c1e5222a1/tjom_a_1010742_f0008_c.jpg)
Figure 9. Photomicrographs of weathering stages for the studied granitoid: (a and b) moderately weathered sample (class III); (c and d) highly weathered sample (class IV); (e and f) completely weathered sample (class V). K-feld, K-feldspar; Plg, plagioclase; Chl, chlorite; Bt, biotite; Qtz, quartz; Cm, clay minerals; Fe ox, Fe oxides.
![Figure 9. Photomicrographs of weathering stages for the studied granitoid: (a and b) moderately weathered sample (class III); (c and d) highly weathered sample (class IV); (e and f) completely weathered sample (class V). K-feld, K-feldspar; Plg, plagioclase; Chl, chlorite; Bt, biotite; Qtz, quartz; Cm, clay minerals; Fe ox, Fe oxides.](/cms/asset/cc4fb598-a5ba-42dd-a282-e6b00f0dd7f4/tjom_a_1010742_f0009_c.jpg)