Figures & data
Figure 1. Overview map of Ligurian landslides from IFFI Project database (CitationISPRA, 2008). Black bold line indicates the Ligurian catchment of the Upper Scrivia valley.
![Figure 1. Overview map of Ligurian landslides from IFFI Project database (CitationISPRA, 2008). Black bold line indicates the Ligurian catchment of the Upper Scrivia valley.](/cms/asset/d7a64f65-1739-40bb-b64a-ca827b8f7dc3/tjom_a_1021393_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Ligurian catchment of the Scrivia Stream (Digital Terrain Model 5 m resolution) and map of slope gradient (right).
![Figure 2. Ligurian catchment of the Scrivia Stream (Digital Terrain Model 5 m resolution) and map of slope gradient (right).](/cms/asset/d8a6b03b-aa5d-43a2-b22c-c8bda844e718/tjom_a_1021393_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. Geological-tectonic sketch map (left). Legend: (1) VU: Voltri Units; (2) SV: Sestri-Voltaggio zone; (3) VPU: Valpolcevera Flysch Units; (4) AUL: Antola unit, marly-limestone flysch; (5) AUS: Antola unit, Montoggio Shales; (6) GU: Gottero unit; (7) OL: Oligo-Miocene formations and (8) Genoa Urban area; black dashed dotted line indicates the geological -section trace and red dashed line indicates the Ligurian catchment of the Upper Scrivia valley. Neotectonic sketch map (right, modified from Fanucci & alii, 1980). Legend: (1) relative uplift; (2) absolute uplift; (3) differential uplift, the arrow show the lowest area; (4) direct fault and (5) tectonic lineation. Green dashed line indicates the Ligurian catchment of the Upper Scrivia valley.
![Figure 3. Geological-tectonic sketch map (left). Legend: (1) VU: Voltri Units; (2) SV: Sestri-Voltaggio zone; (3) VPU: Valpolcevera Flysch Units; (4) AUL: Antola unit, marly-limestone flysch; (5) AUS: Antola unit, Montoggio Shales; (6) GU: Gottero unit; (7) OL: Oligo-Miocene formations and (8) Genoa Urban area; black dashed dotted line indicates the geological -section trace and red dashed line indicates the Ligurian catchment of the Upper Scrivia valley. Neotectonic sketch map (right, modified from Fanucci & alii, 1980). Legend: (1) relative uplift; (2) absolute uplift; (3) differential uplift, the arrow show the lowest area; (4) direct fault and (5) tectonic lineation. Green dashed line indicates the Ligurian catchment of the Upper Scrivia valley.](/cms/asset/85725cc7-c007-4123-a716-25613c77ae5c/tjom_a_1021393_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Geo-lithological sketch map of Upper Scrivia valley with semi-quantitative petro-physical parameters. Legend: (1) conglomerates (good quality rock masses); (2) marly limestone (fair quality rock masses); (3) shales, sandy shales and marls (poor quality rock masses); (4) alluvial deposits; (5) large-scale landslide and (6) DSGSD.
![Figure 4. Geo-lithological sketch map of Upper Scrivia valley with semi-quantitative petro-physical parameters. Legend: (1) conglomerates (good quality rock masses); (2) marly limestone (fair quality rock masses); (3) shales, sandy shales and marls (poor quality rock masses); (4) alluvial deposits; (5) large-scale landslide and (6) DSGSD.](/cms/asset/5485feb2-b83f-4b96-b7aa-252f0a71c1c7/tjom_a_1021393_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5. Large-scale landslides types and morphotectonic elements. (a) Costa Clavarezza complex landslide (Vobbia valley) highlighted by snow cover; (b) Trench in a slope near Crocefieschi (Vobbia river valley); (c) Savignone village on landslide deposits downslope of a conglomerate escarpment; (d) counterslope bordering a closed depression with swampy deposits and marsh vegetation close to Mt. Porale; (e) Nenno village complex landslide downslope of scarps in marly limestone and (f) lower part of the Case Tanadorso lateral spread above the contact between clays and conglomerates.
![Figure 5. Large-scale landslides types and morphotectonic elements. (a) Costa Clavarezza complex landslide (Vobbia valley) highlighted by snow cover; (b) Trench in a slope near Crocefieschi (Vobbia river valley); (c) Savignone village on landslide deposits downslope of a conglomerate escarpment; (d) counterslope bordering a closed depression with swampy deposits and marsh vegetation close to Mt. Porale; (e) Nenno village complex landslide downslope of scarps in marly limestone and (f) lower part of the Case Tanadorso lateral spread above the contact between clays and conglomerates.](/cms/asset/123e4167-a3c6-49cc-89c3-74085b4a1ca4/tjom_a_1021393_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6. Pictures of six case studies; (a) Gabbie di Savignone: lateral spread phenomena Conglomerate/Shales contact; (b) Prarolo (Isola del Cantone): blind valley on the right along a slope characterized by para-karst forms (sinkholes); the profile simulates a valley trend determined by the core of an anticline where the weak Montoggio Shales outcrop; (c) Cipollina (Ronco Scrivia): wide reverse slope and closed depression at Case Porale with marsh vegetation; (d) Sorrivi: scarp/counterscarp slope around the Conglomerate and marly-limestone contact. The conglomerate block is tilted and the slope below the village is characterized by massive presence of rock blocks; (e) Arezzo di Vobbia: note the low ridge and stepped profile. The village lies on an active landslide and (f) Bric Castellazzo at Montessoro (Isola del Cantone): low ridge simulates a syncline strata bedding. Note the complex landslide scarp.
![Figure 6. Pictures of six case studies; (a) Gabbie di Savignone: lateral spread phenomena Conglomerate/Shales contact; (b) Prarolo (Isola del Cantone): blind valley on the right along a slope characterized by para-karst forms (sinkholes); the profile simulates a valley trend determined by the core of an anticline where the weak Montoggio Shales outcrop; (c) Cipollina (Ronco Scrivia): wide reverse slope and closed depression at Case Porale with marsh vegetation; (d) Sorrivi: scarp/counterscarp slope around the Conglomerate and marly-limestone contact. The conglomerate block is tilted and the slope below the village is characterized by massive presence of rock blocks; (e) Arezzo di Vobbia: note the low ridge and stepped profile. The village lies on an active landslide and (f) Bric Castellazzo at Montessoro (Isola del Cantone): low ridge simulates a syncline strata bedding. Note the complex landslide scarp.](/cms/asset/20ee38cb-3379-4adc-9ccd-c585ef57d7b2/tjom_a_1021393_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 7. Geomorphological cross-sections of six different case studies (Gabbie di Savignone, Prarolo, Case Tanadorso e Cipollina, Sorrivi e Nenno, Arezzo di Vobbia, Bric Castellazzo e Montessoro) of large-scale landslides and DSGSDs. MLS: marly limestone with shale interlayers, CON: Conglomerate, SHA: mainly shales.
![Figure 7. Geomorphological cross-sections of six different case studies (Gabbie di Savignone, Prarolo, Case Tanadorso e Cipollina, Sorrivi e Nenno, Arezzo di Vobbia, Bric Castellazzo e Montessoro) of large-scale landslides and DSGSDs. MLS: marly limestone with shale interlayers, CON: Conglomerate, SHA: mainly shales.](/cms/asset/d3ffdc3b-6d21-46ba-a6e1-dfd474242aeb/tjom_a_1021393_f0007_b.gif)