Madrid cycle track: visualizing the cyclable city

Figures & data

Figure 1. Screenshot of the online platform illustrating collected cyclists’ routes.

Figure 2. Cyclists according to age and gender.

Table 1. Route statistics according to the purpose of the journey.

Purpose of the journey	Routes (%)	Routes^a (%)	Speed Av. (km/h)	Time (min) average	Distance (m) average
Commuting	31.11	42.19	15.82	24.52	5889
Leisure	17.17	23.28	15.15	23.94	5705
Sport	5.72	7.76	16.19	80.81	21,002
Shopping	6.30	8.55	14.66	22.29	5648
Management/other	5.51	7.47	15.18	17.07	4231
Study	7.93	10.76	14.82	21.12	5201
Unknown	26.26	–	14.28	28.30	6638
Total/mean over total	100.00	100.00	15.42	31.64	7947

^aRoutes over total number with known purpose.

Table 2. Cycling statistics according to the type of bike of the messengers.

Type of bike	Routes (Uds.)	Speed Av.(km/h)	Gradient Av. (m)	Time (min) average	Distance (m) average
Normal bike	1553	19.6	95.8	30.49	5245
Bullit bike	131	19.7	63.7	11.26	3061
Cargo trike	37	11.4	134.1	14.85	2494

Figure 3. Screenshot of the online map illustrating casual cyclists’ mobility.

Figure 4. Screenshot of the online map illustrating bike messengers' mobility and a pop-up window with information about the selected route.

Figure 5. Screenshot of the ‘Design your route’ online map.

Figure 6. Visualization of casual cyclists’ routes.