1,149
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Science

The stratigraphic and structural setting of metamorphic continental units from Alpine Corsica: clues from the area between Asco and Golo valleys (Central Corsica, France)

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 313-323 | Received 19 Dec 2019, Accepted 19 Mar 2020, Published online: 26 Mar 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1. (a) Tectonic sketch of the central Corsica with the location of the studied area. In the figure, the Hercynian Corsica (HC) is represented in lilac. Within the AC, the Lower Units (TU: Tenda Unit; CU: Caporalino Unit; PU: Pedani Units; FPU: Fuata-Pedanu Unit; PMU: Palasca-Multifao Unit; PPU: Piedigriggio-Prato Unit; CAU: Croce d’Arbitro Unit; CPU: Castiglione-Popolasca Unit), the Schistes Lustrés Complex (SL), the Upper Units (Ba: Balagne Units; Bo: Bas-Ostriconi Unit; Pi: Pineto Unit; SLN: Santa Lucia Nappe) are distinguished. Fb: Francardo Basin; (b) Schematic cross-section of the Central Corsica (modified after CitationDi Rosa et al., 2019a).

Figure 1. (a) Tectonic sketch of the central Corsica with the location of the studied area. In the figure, the Hercynian Corsica (HC) is represented in lilac. Within the AC, the Lower Units (TU: Tenda Unit; CU: Caporalino Unit; PU: Pedani Units; FPU: Fuata-Pedanu Unit; PMU: Palasca-Multifao Unit; PPU: Piedigriggio-Prato Unit; CAU: Croce d’Arbitro Unit; CPU: Castiglione-Popolasca Unit), the Schistes Lustrés Complex (SL), the Upper Units (Ba: Balagne Units; Bo: Bas-Ostriconi Unit; Pi: Pineto Unit; SLN: Santa Lucia Nappe) are distinguished. Fb: Francardo Basin; (b) Schematic cross-section of the Central Corsica (modified after CitationDi Rosa et al., 2019a).

Figure 2. Tectonic sketch of the area and related cross-section. The black box indicates the area of .

Figure 2. Tectonic sketch of the area and related cross-section. The black box indicates the area of Figure 3.

Figure 3. Detail of the geological setting and related cross-section of the Popolasca-Castiglione area. The CPU structural data are plotted in the stereographic projections (Schmidt net, lower hemisphere).

Figure 3. Detail of the geological setting and related cross-section of the Popolasca-Castiglione area. The CPU structural data are plotted in the stereographic projections (Schmidt net, lower hemisphere).

Figure 4. View of the contact between the HC and AC along the Golo Valley. The contact is represented by a deformed, steep surface that upward becomes overturned. Legend: y1b: Pink granites (U3 suite); y3b: monzogranites (U2 suite); RB: Roches Brune Fm.; MV: Metavolcanites and Metavolcaniclastites Fm.

Figure 4. View of the contact between the HC and AC along the Golo Valley. The contact is represented by a deformed, steep surface that upward becomes overturned. Legend: y1b: Pink granites (U3 suite); y3b: monzogranites (U2 suite); RB: Roches Brune Fm.; MV: Metavolcanites and Metavolcaniclastites Fm.

Figure 5. Lithology from LU: (a) Metagranites (CAU); (b) metavolcaniclastic deposits from Metavolcanites and Metavolcaniclastites Fm. (CPU); (c) detritic metalimestone from Detritic Metalimestones Fm. (PPU); (d) metasandstone from Metasandstones Fm. (CPU).

Figure 5. Lithology from LU: (a) Metagranites (CAU); (b) metavolcaniclastic deposits from Metavolcanites and Metavolcaniclastites Fm. (CPU); (c) detritic metalimestone from Detritic Metalimestones Fm. (PPU); (d) metasandstone from Metasandstones Fm. (CPU).

Figure 6. Micro-scale deformations in LU: (a) S1lu/S2lu relationships in metarenite from Metasandstones Fm. (CPU); (b) S2lu foliation in metarhyolite from Metavolcanites and Metavolcaniclastites Fm. (CAU); (c) D2lu phase shear zone in Metagranites (CPU); (d) S2lu/S3lu relationships in metarhyolite from Metavolcanites and Metavolcaniclastites Fm. (PPU).

Figure 6. Micro-scale deformations in LU: (a) S1lu/S2lu relationships in metarenite from Metasandstones Fm. (CPU); (b) S2lu foliation in metarhyolite from Metavolcanites and Metavolcaniclastites Fm. (CAU); (c) D2lu phase shear zone in Metagranites (CPU); (d) S2lu/S3lu relationships in metarhyolite from Metavolcanites and Metavolcaniclastites Fm. (PPU).

Figure 7. Meso-scale deformations in LU: (a) F2lu fold in metalimestone from Metalimestones and Metadolomites Fm. (PPU); (b) S2lu foliation deformed by F3lu folds in Metagranites (CPU); (c) F3lu folds in Metabreccia Fm. (PPU); (d) relationships between S2lu and S3lu foliations in metarhyolite from Metavolcanites and Metavolcaniclastites Fm. (CAU).

Figure 7. Meso-scale deformations in LU: (a) F2lu fold in metalimestone from Metalimestones and Metadolomites Fm. (PPU); (b) S2lu foliation deformed by F3lu folds in Metagranites (CPU); (c) F3lu folds in Metabreccia Fm. (PPU); (d) relationships between S2lu and S3lu foliations in metarhyolite from Metavolcanites and Metavolcaniclastites Fm. (CAU).

Figure 8. Summary of the pressure-temperature-deformation (P/T-d) paths of the LU in the Central Corsica. P/T-d paths of CPU and PPU are after CitationDi Rosa et al. (2017b) and P/T-d path of CAU after CitationMalasoma et al. (2006). The stacking of the LU occurred during the late D2lu phase.

Figure 8. Summary of the pressure-temperature-deformation (P/T-d) paths of the LU in the Central Corsica. P/T-d paths of CPU and PPU are after CitationDi Rosa et al. (2017b) and P/T-d path of CAU after CitationMalasoma et al. (2006). The stacking of the LU occurred during the late D2lu phase.
Supplemental material

MDR_MainMap_AR.pdf

Download PDF (61.1 MB)