1,167
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Social Science

Spatial distribution of criminal events in Lithuania in 2015–2019

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 154-162 | Received 15 Jan 2021, Accepted 03 Nov 2021, Published online: 07 Dec 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Estimated crime density for the five main types of events, for 2015–2019.

Map of Lithuania show crime density as a surface, low to high values represented by diverging colour scale.
Figure 1. Estimated crime density for the five main types of events, for 2015–2019.

Figure 2. Dynamics of crime events in 2015–2019.

Column chart representing absolute numbers and shares of registered events in 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019: five main types of events in open spaces and indoors, and other events.
Figure 2. Dynamics of crime events in 2015–2019.

Figure 3. Dynamics of crime events in open space, number of incidents.

Graphs representing absolute numbers of events by type in 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019.
Figure 3. Dynamics of crime events in open space, number of incidents.

Figure 4. Structure of crime events, average for 2015–2019.

Two pie charts representing structure of crime in Lithuania in open space and indoors.
Figure 4. Structure of crime events, average for 2015–2019.

Figure 5. Crime events in very sparsely populated cells (average for 2015–2019).

Map of Lithuania with hexagonal cells for very sparsely populated areas, the average yearly number of events, represented by background colour, is mainly less than five.
Figure 5. Crime events in very sparsely populated cells (average for 2015–2019).

Table 1. Estimation of types of dynamics for the cell Ci.

Figure 6. Estimated log-transformed relative risk surface, 2015–2019.

Map of Lithuania showing surface of relative risk of crime, represented by diverging colour scale.
Figure 6. Estimated log-transformed relative risk surface, 2015–2019.

Figure 7. (a) high relative risk areas (p ≤ .05); (b) low relative risk areas (p ≤ .05).

Two schematic maps of Lithuania showing high relative risk areas mainly in south-eastern part and low relative risk areas mainly in western part.
Figure 7. (a) high relative risk areas (p ≤ .05); (b) low relative risk areas (p ≤ .05).
Supplemental material

MapPoster_20210916.pdf

Download PDF (17.2 MB)

Data availability statement

The spatial data used in this study have been generated from original event point data via aggregation into a hexagonal lattice. Precise point data on crime are sensitive and cannot be made publicly available. Aggregated data have been published online to provide possibilities for interactive access, viewing and analysis of the data in different aspects. The data have been published as a feature service using the ArcGIS online platform. This service can be further used in combination with other spatial data, as a thematic layer in applications and in decision making tools or for direct access to the data.

An operational dashboard has been constructed, that provides a glimpse into spatial distribution and main statistics of crime events and their layers. The dashboard can be used for simple territorial analysis. This method of publishing data online is based on technological architecture that can be used to update the data most efficiently and in a way that ensures continuity for data service or operational dashboard users.

Online data and relevant information are available at https://lietuvoskartografija.lt/mokslas-visiems/scientific-publications-projects/spatial-distribution-of-criminal-events-over-lithuania-in-2015–2019.