Figures & data
Table 1. Baseline characteristics and sarcopenia index of each group (mean ± SD)*.
Table 2. Basal serum hormone concentrations at weeks 0, 8, and 12 (mean ± SD).
Table 3. Basal serum hormone concentrations at weeks 0, 8, and 12 (mean ± SD).
Figure 2. The results of the one-way analysis of variance test, the significant comparison of the mean difference between post-test 1 and post-test 2 serum levels of MSTN (ng/L) and Fstn (ng/L) in MT1, MT2, DT, C groups. * significance of MT1 with the control group; ** significance of MT2 with the control group; *** significance of DT with the control group; $ significance of MT1 with the DT group and # significance of MT2 with the DT group.
![Figure 2. The results of the one-way analysis of variance test, the significant comparison of the mean difference between post-test 1 and post-test 2 serum levels of MSTN (ng/L) and Fstn (ng/L) in MT1, MT2, DT, C groups. * significance of MT1 with the control group; ** significance of MT2 with the control group; *** significance of DT with the control group; $ significance of MT1 with the DT group and # significance of MT2 with the DT group.](/cms/asset/7ebd4b43-4bfa-4566-98b6-0ab69c547a14/iere_a_2294091_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. The results of the one-way analysis of variance test, the significant comparison of the mean difference between post-test 1 and post-test 2 serum levels of Fstn (ng/L) and cot (ng/L) in MT1, MT2, DT, C groups. * significance of MT1 with the control group; ** significance of MT2 with the control group; *** significance of DT with the control group; $ significance of MT1 with the DT group and # significance of MT2 with the DT group.
![Figure 3. The results of the one-way analysis of variance test, the significant comparison of the mean difference between post-test 1 and post-test 2 serum levels of Fstn (ng/L) and cot (ng/L) in MT1, MT2, DT, C groups. * significance of MT1 with the control group; ** significance of MT2 with the control group; *** significance of DT with the control group; $ significance of MT1 with the DT group and # significance of MT2 with the DT group.](/cms/asset/b1477c6f-f1a4-46cd-8561-be56d7770d85/iere_a_2294091_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. The results of the one-way analysis of variance test, the significant comparison of the mean difference between post-test 1 and post-test 2 serum levels of HJ (ng/L) in MT1, MT2, DT, C groups. * significance of MT1 with the control group; ** significance of MT2 with the control group; *** significance of DT with the control group; $ significance of MT1 with the DT group and # significance of MT2 with the DT group.
![Figure 4. The results of the one-way analysis of variance test, the significant comparison of the mean difference between post-test 1 and post-test 2 serum levels of HJ (ng/L) in MT1, MT2, DT, C groups. * significance of MT1 with the control group; ** significance of MT2 with the control group; *** significance of DT with the control group; $ significance of MT1 with the DT group and # significance of MT2 with the DT group.](/cms/asset/6d4c780f-024d-45c5-873a-910c83056499/iere_a_2294091_f0004_oc.jpg)
Data availability statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.