Figures & data
Table I. Grouper species represented in the catches of the north Andhra region.
![Figure 2. Exploited small-size grouper species: (a) Cephalopholis formosa – 169 mm TL, (b) Epinephelus areolatus – 384 mm TL, (c) E. longispinis – 337 mm TL.](/cms/asset/948378f6-8473-4b99-a17d-647212d7c73c/smar_a_949271_f0002_c.jpg)
![Figure 3. Exploited medium-size grouper species: (a) Cephalopholis sonnerati – 342 mm TL, (b) Epinephelus bleekeri – 308 mm TL, (c) E. chlorostigma – 450 mm TL, (d) E. epistictus – 233 mm TL, (e) E. radiatus – 231 mm TL, (f) E. tauvina – 238 mm TL, (g) E. undulosus – 358 mm TL.](/cms/asset/313bdeaa-1295-4ea2-adc8-a408fbeb64d2/smar_a_949271_f0003_c.jpg)
![Figure 4. Exploited large-size grouper species (adults at left side, juveniles/subadults at right): (a1) Epinephelus coioides – 840 mm TL, (a2) E. coioides – 213 mm TL, (b1) E. malabaricus – 433 mm TL, (b2) E. malabaricus – 175 mm TL, (c1) E. magniscuttis – 502 mm TL, (c2) E.magniscuttis – 261 mm TL, (d1) E. latifasciatus – 893 mm TL, (d2) E. latifasciatus – 363 mm TL.](/cms/asset/31c7ddd8-7598-4f75-a6a2-bd7498e7a197/smar_a_949271_f0004_c.jpg)
Table II. Percentage occurrence of females of Epinephelus coioides in different stages of maturity in various months represented in the catches at Visakhapatnam during the period October 2009 to September 2011.
![Figure 10. (a) Length at first maturity of Epinephelus coioides; (b) length at first maturity of Epinephelus malabaricus.](/cms/asset/8565cd51-49da-428d-b849-51ba719995f1/smar_a_949271_f0010_b.jpg)
Table III. Fecundity of 12 grouper species (genera Cephalopholis and Epinephelus) off the north Andhra region.
![Figure 11. Epinephelus coioides: different maturity stages of ovary and testis (top (a–d): ovary stages I–III; below: ovary stage IV; bottom: testis stages II, III).](/cms/asset/e2802479-2023-47de-a61d-83f901047429/smar_a_949271_f0011_c.jpg)
![Figure 12. Relationship between (a) fecundity – total length, (b) fecundity – body weight and (c) fecundity – ovary weight in Epinephelus coioides.](/cms/asset/bea9a8ed-6e42-44a5-941d-43559c1e03b6/smar_a_949271_f0012_b.jpg)
![Figure 13. Relationship between (a) fecundity – total length, (b) fecundity – body weight and (c) fecundity – ovary weight in Epinephelus malabaricus.](/cms/asset/cf5f2c41-098a-4b00-9c9e-c94f7f168bf7/smar_a_949271_f0013_b.jpg)