613
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

On the quantitative assessment of the effect of multiple process parameters on the printed layer height in 3D inkjet printing

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Article: e2269898 | Received 04 Aug 2023, Accepted 07 Oct 2023, Published online: 24 Oct 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the relation of print resolution and centre-to-centre droplet distance in inkjet printing.

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the relation of print resolution and centre-to-centre droplet distance in inkjet printing.

Figure 2. 3D inkjet printer by Notion Systems: n.jet 3D high laydown.

Figure 2. 3D inkjet printer by Notion Systems: n.jet 3D high laydown.

Table 1. Examined printing parameters.

Table 2. Overview of the printing trials designed based on the central composite design.

Figure 3. CAD-model of the test specimen (1000 mm × 700 mm) (a) and examples of (b) TIFF-Images for layer number 1–20, coverage percentage 90% and (c) layer number 21–40, coverage percentage 90%.

Figure 3. CAD-model of the test specimen (1000 mm × 700 mm) (a) and examples of (b) TIFF-Images for layer number 1–20, coverage percentage 90% and (c) layer number 21–40, coverage percentage 90%.

Figure 4. Average printed layer height (n = 2) of samples printed at various printing conditions and images of the specimens of the print trials #32 and #48 with the largest and lowest layer thickness (corresponding data points marked with a red dotted circle).

Figure 4. Average printed layer height (n = 2) of samples printed at various printing conditions and images of the specimens of the print trials #32 and #48 with the largest and lowest layer thickness (corresponding data points marked with a red dotted circle).

Table 3. Corresponding print settings and measured layer thickness of the printed samples (CP = central Points). Table entries are listed in correspondence to the order in (first row equals to the left data point on the x-axis).

Figure 5. Effect of each parameter (normalised value) on the printed layer height.

Figure 5. Effect of each parameter (normalised value) on the printed layer height.

Figure 6. Effect of print resolution on printed layer height (n = 2) and images of the specimens of the print trials #27 and #16 (corresponding data points marked with a red dotted circle, for detailed parameter values see ).

Figure 6. Effect of print resolution on printed layer height (n = 2) and images of the specimens of the print trials #27 and #16 (corresponding data points marked with a red dotted circle, for detailed parameter values see Table 2).

Figure 7. Effect of coverage percentage on layer height (n = 2) and images of the specimens of the print trials #5 and #47 (corresponding data points marked with a red dotted circle, for detailed parameter values see ).

Figure 7. Effect of coverage percentage on layer height (n = 2) and images of the specimens of the print trials #5 and #47 (corresponding data points marked with a red dotted circle, for detailed parameter values see Table 2).

Figure 8. Effect of droplet volume on layer height (n = 2) and images of the specimens of the print trials #32 and #28 (corresponding data points marked with a red dotted circle, for detailed parameter values see ).

Figure 8. Effect of droplet volume on layer height (n = 2) and images of the specimens of the print trials #32 and #28 (corresponding data points marked with a red dotted circle, for detailed parameter values see Table 2).

Figure 9. Effect of printing speed on layer height (n = 2) and images of the specimens of the print trials #25 and #17 (corresponding data points marked with a red dotted circle, for detailed parameter values see ).

Figure 9. Effect of printing speed on layer height (n = 2) and images of the specimens of the print trials #25 and #17 (corresponding data points marked with a red dotted circle, for detailed parameter values see Table 2).

Figure 10. Effect of UV-Power on layer height (n = 2) and images of the specimens of the print trials #37 and #32 (corresponding data points marked with a red dotted circle, for detailed parameter values see ).

Figure 10. Effect of UV-Power on layer height (n = 2) and images of the specimens of the print trials #37 and #32 (corresponding data points marked with a red dotted circle, for detailed parameter values see Table 2).

Figure 11. Effect of interaction of printing parameters on printed layer height.

Figure 11. Effect of interaction of printing parameters on printed layer height.

Figure 12. Two droplets coalesce while creating a liquid bridge.

Figure 12. Two droplets coalesce while creating a liquid bridge.

Figure 13. TIFF image input and resulted printed squared pattern (size 10 mm × 10 mm, 1 layer) with 50% and 100% coverage percentages printed with a resolution of 360 dpi.

Figure 13. TIFF image input and resulted printed squared pattern (size 10 mm × 10 mm, 1 layer) with 50% and 100% coverage percentages printed with a resolution of 360 dpi.

Figure 14. Diameter of droplets on PET-substrate with a droplet volume of (a) 64 pl, average droplet diameter 133.67 µm; and (b) 26.85 pl, average droplet diameter 87 µm.

Figure 14. Diameter of droplets on PET-substrate with a droplet volume of (a) 64 pl, average droplet diameter 133.67 µm; and (b) 26.85 pl, average droplet diameter 87 µm.

Figure 15. Comparison of samples printed at different printing speeds; (a) TIFF-Image, size 10 mm × 10 mm, (b) sample printed at printing speed 100 mm/s, (c) sample printed at printing speed 300 mm/s.

Figure 15. Comparison of samples printed at different printing speeds; (a) TIFF-Image, size 10 mm × 10 mm, (b) sample printed at printing speed 100 mm/s, (c) sample printed at printing speed 300 mm/s.

Table 4. Corresponding print frequencies of this study at various print velocities and print resolution.