Figures & data
Table 1. Primary study. Fat percentages (F%) of unprocessed and processed condyle samples and fat removal efficiencies of the different cleansing methods
Table 2. Main study. Fat percentages (F%) of unprocessed and processed femoral head samples and fat removal efficiencies of the different cleansing methods. The difference in fat removal efficiency between samples washed with saline pulse lavage (1.6 L) and samples washed with saline pulse lavage and additional warm water was statistically significant (p = 0.008)