Figures & data
Table 1. Flow chart of the patients
Figure 1. Maximum subsidence of the tibial component in the 2 groups with postoperative and 3-month examinations as reference. Mean with 95% CI (whiskers).
![Figure 1. Maximum subsidence of the tibial component in the 2 groups with postoperative and 3-month examinations as reference. Mean with 95% CI (whiskers).](/cms/asset/7cd53f0a-c368-4a21-b970-d4d50584e6cd/iort_a_1205169_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Maximum total point motion (MTPM) of the tibial component in the 2 groups, with postoperative and 3-month examinations as reference. Mean with 95% CI (whiskers).
![Figure 2. Maximum total point motion (MTPM) of the tibial component in the 2 groups, with postoperative and 3-month examinations as reference. Mean with 95% CI (whiskers).](/cms/asset/3236e99d-ebd4-403e-b915-dce6a2271561/iort_a_1205169_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 2. Migration at 10 years with postoperative examination as reference. In patients who were operated bilaterally, only the first-operated knee was included
Table 4. Migration at 10 years with 3-month examination as reference. In patients who were operated bilaterally, only the first-operated knee was included
Table 5. Median differences and 95% CI for migration at 10 years between trabecular metal (TM) and NexGen cemented (NG) tibial components with 3-month examination as reference. In patients who were operated bilaterally, only the first-operated knee was included