16,051
Views
262
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Artificial intelligence for analyzing orthopedic trauma radiographs

Deep learning algorithms—are they on par with humans for diagnosing fractures?

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 581-586 | Received 01 Mar 2017, Accepted 06 Jun 2017, Published online: 06 Jul 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. 2 images from the dataset. The area within the red box is the section presented to the network in order to classify the image. The left image is of a wrist fracture while the right image is without any apparent fracture.

Figure 1. 2 images from the dataset. The area within the red box is the section presented to the network in order to classify the image. The left image is of a wrist fracture while the right image is without any apparent fracture.

Table 1. Raw image and label data for a total of 256,458 images. 70% were reserved for training, 20% for validation, and 10% for testing

Figure 2. Performance of the 5 networks. An epoch is 1 pass over all images.

Figure 2. Performance of the 5 networks. An epoch is 1 pass over all images.

Table 2. Observer fracture outcome compared with gold standard

Table 3. Outcomes compared between observers. Accuracy is the percentage of outcomes where both observers agree, presented with Cohen’s kappa

Table 4. Manual review of classifications where the network failed

Supplemental material

IORT_A_1344459_Supp.pdf

Download PDF (51.7 KB)