Meta-analysis of individual registry results enhances international registry collaboration

Elizabeth W PaxtonKaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA; ;Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Correspondence[email protected]

Maziar MohaddesInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; ;Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden;

Inari LaaksonenTurku University Hospital, Turku, Finland;

Michelle LorimerSouth Australia Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia;

Stephen E GravesUniversity of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia;

Henrik MalchauSwedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden; ;Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA;

Robert S NambaSouthern California Permanente Medical Group, Irvine, CA, USA

John KärrholmInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; ;Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden;

Ola RolfsonInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; ;Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden;

Guy CafriKaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA;

show all

Meta-analysis of individual registry results enhances international registry collaboration

Table 1. US cohort cup designs

Table 2. US cohort descriptive data

Table 3. Reasons for revision and type of revision in US cohort ^a

Table 4. Comparison of traditional and meta-analytic approaches

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Meta-analysis of individual registry results enhances international registry collaboration

Figures & data

Table 1. US cohort cup designs

Table 2. US cohort descriptive data

Table 3. Reasons for revision and type of revision in US cohort a

Table 4. Comparison of traditional and meta-analytic approaches

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date

Table 3. Reasons for revision and type of revision in US cohort ^a