Figures & data
Table 1. Patient characteristics of patients who received a cemented fixed-bearing primary total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with cruciate retaining (CR) or posterior stabilized (PS) knee system in the Netherlands in 2007–2016
Figure 1. Cumulative revision rates of cemented cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis by type of knee system in the Netherlands in 2007–2016 (n = 133,841). Dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval.
![Figure 1. Cumulative revision rates of cemented cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis by type of knee system in the Netherlands in 2007–2016 (n = 133,841). Dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval.](/cms/asset/e1feb53c-3829-4a0e-84bf-f99a2e5ca2fd/iort_a_1518570_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 2. Multivariate survival analyses of cemented cruciate retaining (CR) or posterior stabilized (PS) fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007–2016
Figure 2. Cumulative revision rates of cemented cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis by type of knee system per age category, stratified for sex, in the Netherlands in 2007–2016 (n = 133,841). CR: cruciate retaining TKA system; PS: posterior stabilized TKA system.
![Figure 2. Cumulative revision rates of cemented cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis by type of knee system per age category, stratified for sex, in the Netherlands in 2007–2016 (n = 133,841). CR: cruciate retaining TKA system; PS: posterior stabilized TKA system.](/cms/asset/39c2fb7e-29d7-4847-ac6d-0a46ff6b6891/iort_a_1518570_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 3. Multivariate survival analyses of cemented fixed bearing primary cruciate retaining (CR) or posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007–2016
Table 4. Cumulative 8-year revision rates of cemented fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis with cruciate retaining (CR) or posterior stabilized (PS) knee system, stratified for sex, age, and ASA score, in the Netherlands in 2007–2016 (n = 133,841)
Figure 3. Cumulative major revision rates of cemented cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis by type of knee system per age category, stratified for sex, in the Netherlands in 2007–2016 (n = 133,841). CR: cruciate retaining TKA system; PS: posterior stabilized TKA system
![Figure 3. Cumulative major revision rates of cemented cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis by type of knee system per age category, stratified for sex, in the Netherlands in 2007–2016 (n = 133,841). CR: cruciate retaining TKA system; PS: posterior stabilized TKA system](/cms/asset/c2780088-cf59-4976-bcd5-e7717b3cd967/iort_a_1518570_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 5. Cumulative minor and major 8-year revision rates of cemented fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis by type of TKA system, stratified for sex and age, in the Netherlands in 2007–2016 (n = 133,841)
Table 6. Reasons for minor or major revisions of cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized cemented fixed bearing TKA systems for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007–2016