2,022
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research-article

Higher mid-term revision rates of posterior stabilized compared with cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasties: 133,841 cemented arthroplasties for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007–2016

, , , , &

Figures & data

Table 1. Patient characteristics of patients who received a cemented fixed-bearing primary total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with cruciate retaining (CR) or posterior stabilized (PS) knee system in the Netherlands in 2007–2016

Figure 1. Cumulative revision rates of cemented cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis by type of knee system in the Netherlands in 2007–2016 (n = 133,841). Dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval.

Figure 1. Cumulative revision rates of cemented cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis by type of knee system in the Netherlands in 2007–2016 (n = 133,841). Dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval.

Table 2. Multivariate survival analyses of cemented cruciate retaining (CR) or posterior stabilized (PS) fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007–2016

Figure 2. Cumulative revision rates of cemented cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis by type of knee system per age category, stratified for sex, in the Netherlands in 2007–2016 (n = 133,841). CR: cruciate retaining TKA system; PS: posterior stabilized TKA system.

Figure 2. Cumulative revision rates of cemented cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis by type of knee system per age category, stratified for sex, in the Netherlands in 2007–2016 (n = 133,841). CR: cruciate retaining TKA system; PS: posterior stabilized TKA system.

Table 3. Multivariate survival analyses of cemented fixed bearing primary cruciate retaining (CR) or posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007–2016

Table 4. Cumulative 8-year revision rates of cemented fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis with cruciate retaining (CR) or posterior stabilized (PS) knee system, stratified for sex, age, and ASA score, in the Netherlands in 2007–2016 (n = 133,841)

Figure 3. Cumulative major revision rates of cemented cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis by type of knee system per age category, stratified for sex, in the Netherlands in 2007–2016 (n = 133,841). CR: cruciate retaining TKA system; PS: posterior stabilized TKA system

Figure 3. Cumulative major revision rates of cemented cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis by type of knee system per age category, stratified for sex, in the Netherlands in 2007–2016 (n = 133,841). CR: cruciate retaining TKA system; PS: posterior stabilized TKA system

Table 5. Cumulative minor and major 8-year revision rates of cemented fixed bearing total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis by type of TKA system, stratified for sex and age, in the Netherlands in 2007–2016 (n = 133,841)

Table 6. Reasons for minor or major revisions of cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized cemented fixed bearing TKA systems for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007–2016

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (236.4 KB)