Figures & data
Figure 1. The Mitch proximal epiphyseal replacement (PER).
Figure 2. Flow diagram: inclusion of hips with hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA), Mitch proximal epiphyseal replacement (PER), or cementless metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty (MoP THA) in the study population.
Figure 3. Cumulative incidence for any revision for hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and propensity score matched cementless metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty (MoP THA).
Table 3. Relative risk (RR) of any revision with 95% confidence interval (CI) for hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA), unmatched cementless metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty (MoP THA), and propensity-matched MoP THA
Figure 4. Cumulative incidence for any revision for Mitch proximal epiphyseal replacement (PER) and propensity score matched cementless metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty (MoP THA).
Figure 5. Cumulative incidence for any revision for different designs of resurfacing arthroplasty and propensity score matched cementless metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty (MoP THA).
Table 1. Patient- and surgery-related characteristics for the patients who received hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) or cementless metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty (MoP THA)
Table 2. Patient- and surgery-related characteristics for the patients who received the Mitch proximal epiphyseal replacement (PER) or cementless metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty (MoP THA)
