1,854
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Mortality and revision risk after femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation for undisplaced fracture with arthroplasty for displaced fracture: a population-based study from Danish National Registries

, , &

Figures & data

Figure 1. Flowchart of workup from the Danish Multidisciplinary Registry for Hip Fractures to study population of patients above 70 years treated with IF for undisplaced FNF and arthroplasty for displaced FNF.

Figure 1. Flowchart of workup from the Danish Multidisciplinary Registry for Hip Fractures to study population of patients above 70 years treated with IF for undisplaced FNF and arthroplasty for displaced FNF.

Table 4. Demographic data of the study population and divided by type of osteosynthesis. Values are count (%)

Table 5. Demographic data: patients with arthroplasty divided into hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Values are count (%)

Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival plot with 95% CI comparing internal fixation for undisplaced fracture and arthroplasty for displaced fracture.

Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival plot with 95% CI comparing internal fixation for undisplaced fracture and arthroplasty for displaced fracture.

Table 6. Adjusted regression analysis for mortality concerning internal fixation (IF) for undisplaced FNF versus arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced FNF

Figure 3. Cumulative incidence of reoperation for any reason over time of internal fixation for undisplaced fracture and arthroplasty for displaced fracture with 95% CI.

Figure 3. Cumulative incidence of reoperation for any reason over time of internal fixation for undisplaced fracture and arthroplasty for displaced fracture with 95% CI.

Table 7. Adjusted regression analysis for reoperation concerning internal fixation (IF) for undisplaced FNF versus arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced FNF