Figures & data
Figure 3. Backscattered fields of the lattices under normal incidence at both polarizations. (a) Amplitude and (b) phase at x-polarization, (c) amplitude and (d) phase at y-polarization.
![Figure 3. Backscattered fields of the lattices under normal incidence at both polarizations. (a) Amplitude and (b) phase at x-polarization, (c) amplitude and (d) phase at y-polarization.](/cms/asset/c25be1de-bedf-460d-bd4c-ebccd16ebc32/twrm_a_2241932_f0003_oc.jpg)
Table 1. The optimized results of 16 lattices (Unit: mm).
Figure 5. Geometry of proposed antenna with metasurface. (The reference antenna doesn’t contain the metasurface)
![Figure 5. Geometry of proposed antenna with metasurface. (The reference antenna doesn’t contain the metasurface)](/cms/asset/32e1932b-8269-409c-b7ee-c654a72db88c/twrm_a_2241932_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 8. Simulated radiation patterns of both antennas at 3.90 GHz and measured radiation patterns of both antennas at 4.10 GHz. (a) φ = 0° (b) φ = 90°.
![Figure 8. Simulated radiation patterns of both antennas at 3.90 GHz and measured radiation patterns of both antennas at 4.10 GHz. (a) φ = 0° (b) φ = 90°.](/cms/asset/a983b8d2-a75f-449b-8a82-4a04fd47c506/twrm_a_2241932_f0008_oc.jpg)
Figure 9. The simulated RCS and measured RCS reduction of the reference antenna and the proposed antenna under normal incidence.
![Figure 9. The simulated RCS and measured RCS reduction of the reference antenna and the proposed antenna under normal incidence.](/cms/asset/c3b5fa29-6f25-40f5-b8b4-2c1c6403bc02/twrm_a_2241932_f0009_oc.jpg)
Figure 10. The simulated scattering patterns at 18 GHz on UV coordinates on (a) PEC surface and proposed antenna at (b) x-polarization (c) y-polarization.
![Figure 10. The simulated scattering patterns at 18 GHz on UV coordinates on (a) PEC surface and proposed antenna at (b) x-polarization (c) y-polarization.](/cms/asset/3c4780b8-d274-4127-ac77-2269cb639e8c/twrm_a_2241932_f0010_oc.jpg)
Figure 11. The simulated RCS reduction under oblique incidences for both polarizations. (a) TE-polarization, (b) TM-polarization.
![Figure 11. The simulated RCS reduction under oblique incidences for both polarizations. (a) TE-polarization, (b) TM-polarization.](/cms/asset/765b2d89-bb9d-4bc6-a398-f630426d8efe/twrm_a_2241932_f0011_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Comparison between the proposed slot antenna and previous low-RCS designs.