1,452
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Effect of particle size on in vitro cytotoxicity of titania and alumina nanoparticles

, , &
Pages 625-638 | Received 18 Oct 2010, Accepted 04 Apr 2012, Published online: 04 Jul 2012

Figures & data

Table 1. Commercial source and description of manufactured nanoparticles.

Figure 1. TEM images of particles used in this study. (a) 5 nm TiO2; (b) 200 nm TiO2; (c) 10 nm Al2O3 and (d) 50 nm Al2O3.

Figure 1. TEM images of particles used in this study. (a) 5 nm TiO2; (b) 200 nm TiO2; (c) 10 nm Al2O3 and (d) 50 nm Al2O3.

Table 2. Particle characterisation by DLS, SMPS.

Figure 2. Effect of NP exposure on cell viability, as determined by the colony number after a 5-day exposure. Asterisk (*) represents significant difference from the control group (p ≤ 0.05).

Figure 2. Effect of NP exposure on cell viability, as determined by the colony number after a 5-day exposure. Asterisk (*) represents significant difference from the control group (p ≤ 0.05).

Figure 3. Effect of NP exposure on cell proliferation, as determined by average cell number per colony after: (a) 2-day exposure; (b) 5-day exposure. Asterisk (*) denotes significant difference from the control group or between two comparing groups (p ≤ 0.05).

Figure 3. Effect of NP exposure on cell proliferation, as determined by average cell number per colony after: (a) 2-day exposure; (b) 5-day exposure. Asterisk (*) denotes significant difference from the control group or between two comparing groups (p ≤ 0.05).

Figure 4. Cytotoxicity of metal NPs to A549 cells after a 5-day exposure determined by the alamarBlue®. Asterisk (*) represents significant difference from the control group or between two comparing groups (p ≤ 0.05).

Figure 4. Cytotoxicity of metal NPs to A549 cells after a 5-day exposure determined by the alamarBlue®. Asterisk (*) represents significant difference from the control group or between two comparing groups (p ≤ 0.05).

Figure 5. Comparison of cell proliferation of cell groups cultured with metal NP dispersion and the corresponding supernatant using a clonogenic assay. Asterisk (*) represents significant difference from the control group or between two comparing groups (p ≤ 0.05).

Figure 5. Comparison of cell proliferation of cell groups cultured with metal NP dispersion and the corresponding supernatant using a clonogenic assay. Asterisk (*) represents significant difference from the control group or between two comparing groups (p ≤ 0.05).

Figure 6. Cell response curves for 5 and 200 nm TiO2 and 10 and 50 nm Al2O3 NPs: (a) proliferation and (b) metabolism. Dose is expressed as surface area concentration (m2/L). The curve represents an exponential regression for the response.

Figure 6. Cell response curves for 5 and 200 nm TiO2 and 10 and 50 nm Al2O3 NPs: (a) proliferation and (b) metabolism. Dose is expressed as surface area concentration (m2/L). The curve represents an exponential regression for the response.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.