1,134
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Facile synthesis of copper oxide nanotubes decorated by TiO2 nanoparticles, optical and photocatalytic activity in water

Pages 940-950 | Received 21 Nov 2015, Accepted 17 Apr 2016, Published online: 10 May 2016

Figures & data

Figure 1. Typical SEM micrograph of the CNTNs on glass substrates. The scale bare is 10 µm.

Figure 1. Typical SEM micrograph of the CNTNs on glass substrates. The scale bare is 10 µm.

Figure 2. TEM images of the (a) as-deposited CuO on cellulose fibres, (b) sample which heated at 300 °C for 10 min, (c) the CNTNs which heated at 300 °C for 30 min. The scale bare is 100 nm.

Figure 2. TEM images of the (a) as-deposited CuO on cellulose fibres, (b) sample which heated at 300 °C for 10 min, (c) the CNTNs which heated at 300 °C for 30 min. The scale bare is 100 nm.

Figure 3. Optical transmission of deposited CuO on cellulose fibres which heated at 300 °C for different times of 0, 5 and 10 min.

Figure 3. Optical transmission of deposited CuO on cellulose fibres which heated at 300 °C for different times of 0, 5 and 10 min.

Figure 4. XRD pattern of the CNTNs.

Figure 4. XRD pattern of the CNTNs.

Figure 5. Experimental absorption of the CNTNs on glass substrate and calculated absorption, scattering and extinction cross sections of the CNTNs.

Figure 5. Experimental absorption of the CNTNs on glass substrate and calculated absorption, scattering and extinction cross sections of the CNTNs.

Figure 6. Graph of (αhν)1/2 versus (eV).

Figure 6. Graph of (αhν)1/2 versus hν (eV).

Figure 7. Schematic view of simulated CNTN. The values of the inner and outer radius of CuO nanotube are r1 = 25 nm and r2= 50 nm. Moreover, the length of nanotube and diameter of TiO2 nanoparticles are fixed at L = 2 µm and D = 20 nm.

Figure 7. Schematic view of simulated CNTN. The values of the inner and outer radius of CuO nanotube are r1 = 25 nm and r2= 50 nm. Moreover, the length of nanotube and diameter of TiO2 nanoparticles are fixed at L = 2 µm and D = 20 nm.

Figure 8. Follow-up of the methyl orange oxidation up to 2 h of reaction time under visible light (633 nm helium–neon laser).

Figure 8. Follow-up of the methyl orange oxidation up to 2 h of reaction time under visible light (633 nm helium–neon laser).

Figure 9. Variation of value of Ln(C/C0) at end of 2 h irradiation of 633 nm helium–neon laser versus number of cycles for different annealing time.

Figure 9. Variation of value of Ln(C/C0) at end of 2 h irradiation of 633 nm helium–neon laser versus number of cycles for different annealing time.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.