350
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Influence of fuel-to-oxidizer ratio, potential of hydrogen and annealing temperature on the structural and optical properties of nanocrystalline MgO powders synthesized by the hydrothermal method

ORCID Icon
Article: 2276278 | Received 13 Sep 2023, Accepted 22 Oct 2023, Published online: 03 Nov 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Flowchart for hydrothermal synthesis of MgO nanocrystalline powders.

Figure 1. Flowchart for hydrothermal synthesis of MgO nanocrystalline powders.

Table 1. Experimental conditions for synthesizing MgO nanoparticles.

Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of nanocrystalline MgO powders synthesized at (a) different F/O ratios (b) different pH and (c) different annealing temperatures.

Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of nanocrystalline MgO powders synthesized at (a) different F/O ratios (b) different pH and (c) different annealing temperatures.

Table 2. Lattice parameter (a), crystalline size, X-ray density (ρx), percentage of porosity, dislocation density (δ) and lattice strain (ε) of MgO nanocrystal for different ratio of fuel-to-oxidizer, deferent pH and different annealing temperature.

Figure 3. Crystallite size and dislocation density values of the nanocrystalline MgO powders at (a) different F/O (b) different pH and (c) different annealing temperatures.

Figure 3. Crystallite size and dislocation density values of the nanocrystalline MgO powders at (a) different F/O (b) different pH and (c) different annealing temperatures.

Figure 4. The Rietveld refinements of nanocrystalline MgO powders synthesized at F/O (0.75): (a–c) pH 12, annealed at 500 °C, 750 and 1000, respectively (d) pH 10, annealed at 500 °C (e) pH 8, annealed at 500 °C.

Figure 4. The Rietveld refinements of nanocrystalline MgO powders synthesized at F/O (0.75): (a–c) pH 12, annealed at 500 °C, 750 and 1000, respectively (d) pH 10, annealed at 500 °C (e) pH 8, annealed at 500 °C.

Table 3. Profile factor (Rp), weighted residual factor (Rwp), expected residual factor (Rexp) and goodness of fit (χ2) of MgO samples from Rietveld refinement.

Table 4. EDS data for MgO at various synthesis conditions.

Figure 5. FESEM images and EDS spectra of the MgO samples annealed at temperatures of (a) 500 °C, (b) 750 °C and (d) 1000 °C.

Figure 5. FESEM images and EDS spectra of the MgO samples annealed at temperatures of (a) 500 °C, (b) 750 °C and (d) 1000 °C.

Figure 6. FTIR spectrum of nanocrystalline MgO powders synthesized att (a) different F/O (b) different pH and (c) different annealing temperatures.

Figure 6. FTIR spectrum of nanocrystalline MgO powders synthesized att (a) different F/O (b) different pH and (c) different annealing temperatures.

Figure 7. Diffuse reflectance spectra of the nanocrystalline MgO powders synthesized at (a) different F/O ratios (b) different pH and (c) different annealing temperatures.

Figure 7. Diffuse reflectance spectra of the nanocrystalline MgO powders synthesized at (a) different F/O ratios (b) different pH and (c) different annealing temperatures.

Figure 8. The Kubelka–Munk elaboration of the nanocrystalline MgO powders synthesized at (a) different F/O ratios (b) different pH and (c) different annealing temperatures.

Figure 8. The Kubelka–Munk elaboration of the nanocrystalline MgO powders synthesized at (a) different F/O ratios (b) different pH and (c) different annealing temperatures.

Table 5. Direct and indirect band gap of nanocrystalline MgO powders at various synthesis conditions.

Table 6. Comparison of bandgap widths and average particle size of MgO nanoparticles.

Data availability

All data that support the findings of this study have been included in the article.