1,686
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
SPORT AND EXERCISE MEDICINE AND HEALTH

Longer-term effects of minimalist shoes on running performance, strength and bone density: A 20-week follow-up studyFootnote*

ORCID Icon, , , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 402-412 | Published online: 13 Aug 2018
 

Abstract

This study investigated whether male runners improve running performance, running economy, ankle plantar flexor strength, and alter running biomechanics and lower limb bone mineral density when gradually transitioning to using minimalist shoes for 100% of weekly running. The study was a planned follow-up of runners (n = 50) who transitioned to minimalist or conventional shoes for 35% of weekly structured training in a previous 6-week randomised controlled trial. In that trial, running performance and economy improved more with minimalist shoes than conventional shoes. Runners in each group were instructed to continue running in their allocated shoe during their own preferred training programme for a further 20 weeks while increasing allocated shoe use to 100% of weekly training. At the 20-week follow-up, minimalist shoes did not affect performance (effect size: 0.19; p = 0.218), running economy (effect size: ≤ 0.24; p ≥ 0.388), stride rate or length (effect size: ≤ 0.12; p ≥ 0.550), foot strike (effect size: ≤ 0.25; p ≥ 0.366), or bone mineral density (effect size: ≤ 0.40; p ≥ 0.319). Minimalist shoes increased plantar flexor strength more than conventional shoes when runners trained with greater mean weekly training distances (shoe*distance interaction: p = 0.036). After greater improvements with minimalist shoes during the initial six weeks of a structured training programme, increasing minimalist shoe use from 35% to 100% over 20 weeks, when runners use their own preferred training programme, did not further improve performance, running economy or alter running biomechanics and lower limb bone mineral density. Minimalist shoes improved plantar flexor strength more than conventional shoes in runners with greater weekly training distances.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jogger’s World Adelaide store for providing the footwear for this research at reduced cost, and ASICS Oceania for donating twenty pairs of ASICS Gel-Cumulus. The lead author received a Vice Chancellor and President’s Scholarship from the University of South Australia to provide financial support for this study and has previously received funding from ASICS Oceania to attend a Sports Medicine Australia conference. DT is funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council Career Development Fellowship (ID: 1126229). No supporting organisation had any role in data collection, analysis and interpretation, or the right to approve or disapprove publication of this manuscript.

Disclosure statement

Joel T. Fuller has previously received funding from ASICS Oceania to attend a Sports Medicine Australia conference.

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2018.1505958).

Notes

* Research was conducted at the Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a University of South Australia Vice Chancellor and President's Scholarship and a National Health and Medical Research Council Career Development Fellowship.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.