Figures & data
Figure 1 . The average group modelled in-season trend vs. subsequent lockdown, return to training and restart periods. Values and error bars beyond the dashed lines represent a true change that is above 90% likelihood.
Figure 2 . Individual participants modelled in-season trends and subsequent MW scores during lockdown, return to training and in-season. Values and error bars beyond the dashed lines represent a change that is above 90% likely true. Graph (A) demonstrates an example participant whose MW scores were maintained. Graph (B) demonstrates an example participant whose MW scores were decreased. Graph (C) demonstrates an example participant whose MW scores were increased.
Table 1 . The individual responses to the modelled in-season trend vs. lockdown, return to training and restart periods.
Figure 3 . The weekly breakdown of the average number and types of sessions completed during the lockdown and the subsequent weekly MW score.
