308
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
PHYSIOLOGY & NUTRITION

A lab-based comparison of differential ratings of perceived exertion between a run and jump protocol involving low or high impacts on the lower extremities

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 746-754 | Published online: 25 Apr 2022
 

ABSTRACT

The rating of perceived exertion method (RPE) allows to describe training intensity in a single value. To better understand the underlying components, the separate rating of perceived breathlessness (RPE-B) and leg-muscle exertion (RPE-L) has been proposed. Here we hypothesised that the separation between the two components may (partly) be determined by the impacts on the lower extremities. In this study, we aimed to experimentally evaluate the differential effect of high versus low impact running and jumping on RPE-B and RPE-L in team sport activities by manipulating the movement strategy (heel strike and passive landing pattern versus forefoot strike and active landing pattern). Eighteen recreational team sport players participated in two submaximal tests consisting of a sequence of running and jumping bouts, whilst ground reaction forces (GRF) were collected. RPE-B and RPE-L data were collected after each bout using the CR100 scale. Paired-samples t-tests were used to analyse between-session differences in these variables. GRF analysis showed that absorption mechanics differed considerably between the two sessions. RPE-L was on average 6.50 AU higher in the low impact session (p = 0.006). However, RPE-B was also increased by 4.96 AU with low impact (p = 0.009). We conclude that the extent to which the lower extremities are being exposed to high or low impacts does not explain a possible separation between the two RPE types.

Highlights

  • The separate rating of the different underlying components of RPE (e.g. variables related to the cardiorespiratory and the muscular system) may provide more insight in the relationship between training load and training outcomes, which likely differs between these components.

  • The findings of this study do not support the idea that the separation in rating between perceived breathlessness (RPE-B, cardiorespiratory) and leg-muscle exertion (RPE-L, muscular) is also rooted in the extent to which musculoskeletal structures in the lower extremities are being exposed to high or low impacts.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 It is common in practice to ask players at the end of the training session to rate their perceived exertion for the entire session. This value reflects the average perceived exertion over the entire session and is described as the session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie [grant number IWT HBC.2017.0569].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.