339
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
BIOMECHANICS AND MOTOR CONTROL

Mechanical loading prediction through accelerometry data during walking and running

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1518-1527 | Published online: 11 Aug 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Currently, there is no way to assess mechanical loading variables such as peak ground reaction forces (pGRF) and peak loading rate (pLR) in clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to develop accelerometry-based equations to predict both pGRF and pLR during walking and running. One hundred and thirty one subjects (79 females; 76.9 ± 19.6 kg) walked and ran at different speeds (2–14 km·h−1) on a force plate–instrumented treadmill while wearing accelerometers at their ankle, lower back and hip. Regression equations were developed to predict pGRF and pLR from accelerometry data. Leave-one-out cross-validation was used to calculate prediction accuracy and Bland–Altman plots. Our pGRF prediction equation was compared with a reference equation previously published. Body mass and peak acceleration were included for pGRF prediction and body mass and peak acceleration rate for pLR prediction. All pGRF equation coefficients of determination were above 0.96, and a good agreement between actual and predicted pGRF was observed, with a mean absolute percent error (MAPE) below 7.3%. Accuracy indices from our equations were better than previously developed equations. All pLR prediction equations presented a lower accuracy compared to those developed to predict pGRF. Walking and running pGRF can be predicted with high accuracy by accelerometry-based equations, representing an easy way to determine mechanical loading in free-living conditions. The pLR prediction equations yielded a somewhat lower prediction accuracy compared with the pGRF equations.

Highlights

  • Peak ground reaction forces can be accurately predicted through raw accelerometry data.

  • These predictions are valid for a broad range of body masses and for ankle, lower back and hip accelerometer placements.

  • Peak loading rate prediction presented lower accuracy compared with peak ground reaction force prediction.

  • These findings result in a simple method to predict mechanical loading in clinical practice, which is relevant in some areas of sports medicine such as bone health and injury prevention.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participants who took part in this research and all who have collaborated in the research project.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [grant number PTDC/DTP-DES/0968/2014] and by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Operational Competitiveness Programme (COMPETE) [grant number POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016707]. The study was developed in the Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure (CIAFEL) funded by ERDF through the COMPETE and by the FCT [grant number UID/DTP/00617/2020], and Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), funded by the FCT [grant number LA/P/0064/2020]. Lucas Veras, Florêncio Diniz-Sousa and Giorjines Boppre are supported by the FCT [grant numbers UI/BD/150673/2020, SFRH/BD/117622/2016 and SFRH/BD/146976/2019].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.