What versus where: Investigating how autobiographical memory retrieval differs when accessed with thematic versus spatial information

ABSTRACT

Autobiographical memory research has investigated how cueing distinct aspects of a past event can trigger different recollective experiences. This research has stimulated theories about how autobiographical knowledge is accessed and organized. Here, we test the idea that thematic information organizes multiple autobiographical events whereas spatial information organizes individual past episodes by investigating how retrieval guided by these two forms of information differs. We used a novel autobiographical fluency task in which participants accessed multiple memory exemplars to event theme and spatial (location) cues followed by a narrative description task in which they described the memories generated to these cues. Participants recalled significantly more memory exemplars to event theme than to spatial cues; however, spatial cues prompted faster access to past memories. Results from the narrative description task revealed that memories retrieved via event theme cues compared to spatial cues had a higher number of overall details, but those recalled to the spatial cues were recollected with a greater concentration on episodic details than those retrieved via event theme cues. These results provide evidence that thematic information organizes and integrates multiple memories whereas spatial information prompts the retrieval of specific episodic content from a past event.

KEYWORDS:

• Autobiographical memory
• Cued retrieval
• Episodic memory
• Event fluency
• Memory organization

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Wendy Wang and Julia Donahue for assistance with transcriptions and memory scoring.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

An NSERC Discovery grant [grant number RGPIN-04241] awarded to Signy Sheldon supported the work reported in this paper.