Imitation of in-group versus out-group members’ facial expressions of anger: A test with a time perception task

Abstract

This research investigated the automatic imitation of facial expressions of anger by in-group and out-group members, using a temporal estimation task. Individuals typically overestimate duration represented by angry faces, probably due to increases in arousal (Droit-Volet, Brunot, & Niedenthal, 2004). Overestimation is not observed when imitation of the facial expressions is inhibited, suggesting that embodied simulation mediates the changes in arousal (Effron, Niedenthal, Gil, & Droit-Volet, 2006). This method thus provides an implicit measure of imitation and was used to test the hypothesis that individuals imitate in-group, but not out-group members’ facial expressions of emotion. In separate studies Chinese and French Caucasian participants were presented with short (400 ms) and long (1600 ms) standard durations in a temporal bisection task. They then categorized standard and intermediate durations, represented by angry and neutral faces, in terms of similarity to the short and long standard durations. Half of the face stimuli were Chinese, and half Caucasian. Results revealed a bias in the temporal perception of emotion for the Caucasian participants when they were presented with Caucasian facial expressions and not Chinese ones. In contrast, this bias in time perception was observed when Chinese individuals imitated faces of both in- and out-group members. The results of the Chinese participants are interpreted in terms of familiarity with and motivations to understand the emotional expressions of members of a host culture.

Acknowledgements

Preparation of this article was supported by the Prosodie ACI Grant Pro-0052, Ministère de la Recherche (France) and by NSF grant BCS-0350687.

Notes

¹The three-way interaction involves the comparison of 28 conditions (7 2 2) and therefore lacks statistical power (e.g., participants sample, degree of freedom) for interpretation.

²Note also that, in order for this transformation to be accomplished on proportions, values of 1 and 0 had to be replaced with a high and low decimal, respectively. We substituted 0.944 for 1, and 0.056 for 0.