909
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

A toolmaker’s perspective on CRISPR-directed gene editing as a therapeutic strategy for leukemia and beyond

&
Pages 587-592 | Received 26 Mar 2021, Accepted 25 May 2021, Published online: 07 Jun 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. The many faces of CRISPR/Cas gene editing. The activated CRISPR/Cas9 complex can modified cell behavior in a variety of ways. These include deletion of sections of genomic DNA, the insertion or replacement of segments of the genome (viewed as being traditional genomic gene editing), modification of gene expression where in the complex functions as a repressor or activator of transcription and modulation of chromatin structure using effector domains of remodeling enzymes. dCas9 refers to a Cas nine protein that is devoid of double-strand DNA breakage, while Nickase refers to a Cas9 protein where in only one of the two DNA cleavage domains of Cas9 is active. This results in the making of a single strand of the helix

Figure 1. The many faces of CRISPR/Cas gene editing. The activated CRISPR/Cas9 complex can modified cell behavior in a variety of ways. These include deletion of sections of genomic DNA, the insertion or replacement of segments of the genome (viewed as being traditional genomic gene editing), modification of gene expression where in the complex functions as a repressor or activator of transcription and modulation of chromatin structure using effector domains of remodeling enzymes. dCas9 refers to a Cas nine protein that is devoid of double-strand DNA breakage, while Nickase refers to a Cas9 protein where in only one of the two DNA cleavage domains of Cas9 is active. This results in the making of a single strand of the helix

Table 1. Outline of Target Sites for Cas9-mediated Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in T-cells

Figure 2. Method for knockout of PD-1 in T cells. PBMCs were isolated from patient blood samples, and T cells were further isolated from the PBMC population by FACS. Isolated naïve T cells were targeted via liposome-based transfection with a CRISPR construct plasmid and a GFP reporter. Successfully transfected cells were pooled and activated with a weak activation factor, and allowed to expand for several days. After expansion and confirmation of cytotoxic potential, the activated cells, tumor infiltration capacity was analyzed in 3D culture

Figure 2. Method for knockout of PD-1 in T cells. PBMCs were isolated from patient blood samples, and T cells were further isolated from the PBMC population by FACS. Isolated naïve T cells were targeted via liposome-based transfection with a CRISPR construct plasmid and a GFP reporter. Successfully transfected cells were pooled and activated with a weak activation factor, and allowed to expand for several days. After expansion and confirmation of cytotoxic potential, the activated cells, tumor infiltration capacity was analyzed in 3D culture

Figure 3. 3D culture-based infiltration assay outline. (A) Fluorescence-labeled T cells were suspended in a collagen matrix, layered with fibroblasts and labeled melanoma cells in the displayed layered 3D culture. This culture was live imaged over the course of 72 hours, with the migration vector and velocity of the T-cells recorded. (B) After 72 hours, the overall velocity of the T cells with and without PD-1 knockout were analyzed. Mock-transfected cells exhibited surface PD-1 on approximately 25% of cells, while PD1-KO cells showed surface PD-1 on less than 5%. An increase in tumor infiltration velocity of over 3x was seen between mock-transfected and PD-1 KO T cells

Figure 3. 3D culture-based infiltration assay outline. (A) Fluorescence-labeled T cells were suspended in a collagen matrix, layered with fibroblasts and labeled melanoma cells in the displayed layered 3D culture. This culture was live imaged over the course of 72 hours, with the migration vector and velocity of the T-cells recorded. (B) After 72 hours, the overall velocity of the T cells with and without PD-1 knockout were analyzed. Mock-transfected cells exhibited surface PD-1 on approximately 25% of cells, while PD1-KO cells showed surface PD-1 on less than 5%. An increase in tumor infiltration velocity of over 3x was seen between mock-transfected and PD-1 KO T cells

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.