3,052
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Densified wood impregnated with phenol resin for reduced set-recovery

ORCID Icon
Pages 35-41 | Received 25 Nov 2019, Accepted 10 Feb 2020, Published online: 04 Mar 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1. Poplar specimens prepared for flexure tests. (A) un-densified 15 mm thickness, (B) densified to 7 mm, (C) densified to 5 mm, and (D) densified to 2 mm.

Figure 1. Poplar specimens prepared for flexure tests. (A) un-densified 15 mm thickness, (B) densified to 7 mm, (C) densified to 5 mm, and (D) densified to 2 mm.

Table 1. Pressing parameters for densification.

Figure 2. Micrograph of impregnated, densified spruce with a 2 mm target thickness. (A) Penetrated phenol resin present in lumens and (B) collapsed tracheids.

Figure 2. Micrograph of impregnated, densified spruce with a 2 mm target thickness. (A) Penetrated phenol resin present in lumens and (B) collapsed tracheids.

Table 2. THM and resin treatment data for beech, poplar, and spruce specimens.

Figure 3. Mean density profiles of beech (first row), poplar (second row), and spruce (third row) specimens.

Figure 3. Mean density profiles of beech (first row), poplar (second row), and spruce (third row) specimens.

Table 3. Mechanical test data of impregnated, THM treated specimens (mean values ± 1 standard deviation), and reference values.

Figure 4. Set-recovery of THM-treated specimens grouped by initial thickness.

Figure 4. Set-recovery of THM-treated specimens grouped by initial thickness.

Table 4. Set-recovery after four wetting-drying cycles (mean values ±1 standard deviation).