Figures & data
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the investigated structure typologies, based on Fazlur Kahn (Ali and Moon Citation2007) (left) and schematic representation of the tube-in-tube system with its structural behaviour (right).
![Figure 1. Schematic representation of the investigated structure typologies, based on Fazlur Kahn (Ali and Moon Citation2007) (left) and schematic representation of the tube-in-tube system with its structural behaviour (right).](/cms/asset/b302044f-8d84-49cb-b0c1-d08a9b2a2319/swoo_a_2086066_f0001_ob.jpg)
Figure 3. Structural system (left) and the statically equivalent model for determining the rotational stiffness of the beam-column joint (right).
![Figure 3. Structural system (left) and the statically equivalent model for determining the rotational stiffness of the beam-column joint (right).](/cms/asset/313142a9-1eea-4525-b56f-8a26658c8041/swoo_a_2086066_f0003_ob.jpg)
Figure 4. Statically equivalent member dimensions representing the approach of the joint stiffness Krot in comparison to the member dimensions.
![Figure 4. Statically equivalent member dimensions representing the approach of the joint stiffness Krot in comparison to the member dimensions.](/cms/asset/339b7755-da5f-45f8-ae68-20f0a89202ab/swoo_a_2086066_f0004_ob.jpg)
Table 1. Overview of the simulation-parameters for the different systems.
Figure 6. Comparison of the peak accelerations and the natural frequency fn (left) for the analysed tube-in-tube systems (right).
![Figure 6. Comparison of the peak accelerations and the natural frequency fn (left) for the analysed tube-in-tube systems (right).](/cms/asset/426a5c38-1f48-437c-8509-a2955a729e37/swoo_a_2086066_f0006_ob.jpg)
Figure 7. A single-degree-of-freedom system (a) is used to represent the building stiffness in the first mode. The equivalent spring-mass system (b) is denoted by the stiffness K (c).
![Figure 7. A single-degree-of-freedom system (a) is used to represent the building stiffness in the first mode. The equivalent spring-mass system (b) is denoted by the stiffness K (c).](/cms/asset/9173b8af-a26d-4ccf-bd54-30dc23688eaa/swoo_a_2086066_f0007_ob.jpg)
Figure 8. Comparison of parameters with constant reference values. The reference values are: nc = 33, vb,0 = 25.0 m/s, pfloor = 7.5 kN/m2, δs = 0.05.
![Figure 8. Comparison of parameters with constant reference values. The reference values are: nc = 33, vb,0 = 25.0 m/s, pfloor = 7.5 kN/m2, δs = 0.05.](/cms/asset/83032920-58ee-4e7f-be89-23869a4565b1/swoo_a_2086066_f0008_ob.jpg)