496
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Influence of surface treatment on the bonding quality of wood for load-bearing purposes

, , , &
Pages 2128-2139 | Received 11 Sep 2023, Accepted 06 Oct 2023, Published online: 15 Nov 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Face milling method according to DIN 8589 Part 3. left: circumferential face milling (planing), right: face milling, vc: cutting speed, vf: feed rate (following DIN 8589-3).

Figure 1. Face milling method according to DIN 8589 Part 3. left: circumferential face milling (planing), right: face milling, vc: cutting speed, vf: feed rate (following DIN 8589-3).

Figure 2. Compacted zone of the wood structure after milling with the blunted cutter 1, cutting with the fiber (compaction depth 250 µm); Scale 1,200. Source: PhD thesis K. Rehm, TU Dresden.

Figure 2. Compacted zone of the wood structure after milling with the blunted cutter 1, cutting with the fiber (compaction depth 250 µm); Scale 1,200. Source: PhD thesis K. Rehm, TU Dresden.

Figure 3. Influence of the angle between cut and grain direction on the quality of the surface.

Figure 3. Influence of the angle between cut and grain direction on the quality of the surface.

Figure 4. Comparison of surface finish (top: sawn, bottom: face milling). Source: BA Sachsen.

Figure 4. Comparison of surface finish (top: sawn, bottom: face milling). Source: BA Sachsen.

Figure 5. Valley quotient according to Neusser cited in (Troeger and Schneider Citation2015); Dependence on (fz) and (d). Source: IfW.

Figure 5. Valley quotient according to Neusser cited in (Troeger and Schneider Citation2015); Dependence on (fz) and (d). Source: IfW.

Figure 6. Deformation zone when sawing softwood with convex secondary cutting teeth. Source: unpublished lecture notes “Fundamentals of woodworking” IfW Stuttgart.

Figure 6. Deformation zone when sawing softwood with convex secondary cutting teeth. Source: unpublished lecture notes “Fundamentals of woodworking” IfW Stuttgart.

Figure 7. Finishing tool and (exemplary) chip of a finished beech wood surface. Source: BA Sachsen.

Figure 7. Finishing tool and (exemplary) chip of a finished beech wood surface. Source: BA Sachsen.

Table 1. Test overview.

Figure 8. Test setup for face milling: Left straight cutting edge, right crowned cutting edge.

Figure 8. Test setup for face milling: Left straight cutting edge, right crowned cutting edge.

Figure 9. Roughness after water application (13 g/m²) and re-drying (measured in the fiber direction).

Figure 9. Roughness after water application (13 g/m²) and re-drying (measured in the fiber direction).

Figure 10. Tensile shear strength after storage sequence A1, A4, and A5 as a function of the type of surface treatment.

Figure 10. Tensile shear strength after storage sequence A1, A4, and A5 as a function of the type of surface treatment.

Table 2. Percentage of wood broken.

Figure 11. Adhesive joint Sample 2: Detail section 3 from – SE image left, BSE image right; Element distribution of O, C, and Si measured with EDX.

Figure 11. Adhesive joint Sample 2: Detail section 3 from – SE image left, BSE image right; Element distribution of O, C, and Si measured with EDX.