440
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Reliability and validity of pediatric powered mobility outcome measures

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 882-887 | Received 17 Jun 2020, Accepted 01 Sep 2020, Published online: 12 Sep 2020
 

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Powered Mobility Program (PMP) and the Israel Ministry of Health Powered Mobility Proficiency Test (PM-PT); to test inter-rater reliability of the Assessment of Learning Powered Mobility (ALP) tool; to determine the convergent validity of these measures for children with physical disabilities.

Materials and methods

Participants included 30 children (mean 10 years, 6 months [SD 3 years, 7 months]; range: 6–18 years) with cerebral palsy and other neuromuscular disorders. Participants were non-proficient powered wheelchair drivers. Two blinded raters assessed the driving ability by viewing videos of the participants twice as they drove a pre-designed route at ALYN Hospital, Israel. They were assessed via the PMP, ALP and PM-PT outcome measures. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC2,1) were used to test intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to assess convergent validity.

Results

The PMP intra-rater reliability revealed ICCs2,1 of coefficients were 0.97/0.98 for both raters. For the PM-PT the ICC2,1 was 0.89/0.96 for both raters. The PMP inter-rater reliability ICC2,1 was 0.94/0.87 for the two tests, for the PM-PT the ICC2,1 was 0.91/0.87 for the two tests and for the ALP the ICC2,1 was 0.83. The convergent validity between the PMP and the PM-PT was rs=0.96, between the PMP and ALP was rs=0.89 and between the PM-PT and ALP was rs=0.87.

Conclusions

The PMP and PM-PT intra and interrater reliability were good to excellent, the ALP inter-rater reliability was good and the convergent validity between all three measures was good to excellent.

    Implications for rehabilitation

  • There is evidence of validity and reliability for three tests of powered wheelchair proficiency (PMP, PM-PT and ALP).

  • Children using powered mobility, aged 6–18 years, now have outcome measures with empirical evidence that was previously lacking.

  • When time for assessment is limited, the shorter PM-PT can be used instead of the more comprehensive PMP.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the children and families that participated in the study. The authors thank Osnat Yaniv and Avigail Haimovski for their help in assessing the children. This study is part of a doctoral dissertation by the first author.

Disclosure statement

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Notes

1 The ICC that was used in the current study is termed by (20) as ICC2,1 and is defined as a measure that suits a situation where each subject is measured by each rater, and raters are considered representative of a larger population of similar raters. In addition, the reliability coefficient is calculated from a single measurement.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by ALYN Hospital. The first author received a scholarship from the University of Haifa for her doctoral research which includes the reported study.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 340.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.