Outcomes of a child-based manual wheelchair skills peer training program: an exploratory case report

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this exploratory case series was to describe the outcomes for both a child-learner and a child-peer after a single manual wheelchair (MWC) skills training session involving child-based peer training techniques, followed by related home-based skills practice.

Materials and methods

Participants were a 9-year-old with L4–L5 spina bifida (pseudonym: Amari) and a 3-year-old with T10 spina bifida (pseudonym: Mary). Pre-intervention examination included administration of the Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q), the MWC short scale within the Mobility domain of the Paediatric Evaluation of Disability – Computer Adapted Test (MWC PEDI-CAT), and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). The peer training session, facilitated by a physical therapy team, involved games and activities involving MWC use. When appropriate, Amari was asked to talk aloud and verbally describe the components of the skills she was performing. Each child and her mother were instructed in specific MWC skills to practice at home over a 3-week period.

Results

Both participants’ post-intervention WST-Q capacity, confidence, and performance scores increased. Increases in parent-proxy COPM scores indicated clinically meaningful change in all identified occupational performance problems. Mary’s total MWC PEDI-CAT post-intervention score increased by 11 points. Both mothers reported that the participation in the activities helped also to improve their child’s self-esteem and self-image.

Conclusions

Both the participants in this exploratory case appeared to demonstrate improvements in MWC skills, self-esteem, and self-image following a single child-based MWC skills peer training session and related home-based skills practice. Future research involving such peer training methods is warranted.

Keywords:

• Peer training
• manual wheelchair skills
• manual wheelchair skills training
• spina bifida
• paediatrics

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).