Figures & data
Table 1. Description of studies included in the review.
Table 2. A summary of the CERQual evidence profile.
Bay S. Communicating through social media: How persons with ALS use the internet to maintain social connections [Doctoral dissertation] Chicago (IL): University of Illinois at Chicago; 2017. Bruce C, Edmundson A, Coleman M. Writing with voice: an investigation of the use of a voice recognition system as a writing aid for a man with aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2003;38(2):131–148. Caron J, Light J. My world has expanded even though I’m stuck at home": experiences of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who use augmentative and alternative communication and social media. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24(4):680–695. Caron J, Light J. Social media experience of adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communication. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;19(1):30–42. Carpe A, Harder K, Tam C, et al. Perceptions of writing and communication aid use among children with a physical disability. Assist Technol. 2010;22(2):87–98. Childes J, Palmer A, Fried-Oken M, et al. The use of technology for phone and face-to-face communication after total laryngectomy. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;26(1):99–112. Chung Y, Behrmann M, Banna B, et al. Perspective of high tech augmentative and alternative communication users with cerebral palsy at the post-secondary level. Perspect Augment Altern Commun. 2012;21(2):43–55. Davis R. Reflections of nine participants regarding their experiences of being african American and using augmentative and alternative communication across their lifespan at home, school, vocation, and community [Doctoral Dissertation]. Pennsylvania (PA): Pennsylvania State University; 2008. Dickerson S, Stone V, Panchura C, et al. The meaning of communication: experiences with augmentative communication devices. Rehabil Nurs. 2002;27(6):215–220. Hodge S. Why is the potential of augmentative and alternative communication not being realized? Exploring the experiences of people who use communication aids. Disabil Soc. 2007;22(5):457–471. Howery K. Out of time: the experience of speech-generating device users. Commun Disord Q. 2018;40(1):40–49. Iacono T, Lyon K, Johnson H, et al. Experiences of adults with complex communication needs receiving and using low tech AAC: an Australian context. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(5):392–401. Johansson M, Carlsson M, Sonnander K. Communication difficulties and the use of communication strategies: from the perspective of individuals with aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012;47(2):144–155. Lund S, Light J. Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part III – contributing factors. Augment Altern Commun. 2007;23(4):323–335. Martin A, Newell C. Living through a computer voice: a personal account. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2013;38(3):96–104. Murphy J. I prefer contact this close": perceptions of AAC by people with motor neurone disease and their communication partners. Augment Altern Commun. 2004;20(4):259–271. Paterson H, Carpenter C. Using different methods to communicate: How adults with severe acquired communication difficulties make decisions about the communication methods they use and how they experience them. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(17):1522–1530. Smith M, Connolly I. Roles of aided communication: perspectives of adults who use AAC. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2008;3(5):260–273. Trembath D, Balandin S, Stancliffe R, et al. Communication is everything: the experiences of volunteers who use AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2010;26(2):75–86.