47
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Should I stay or should I go? An exploratory study comparing wheelchair-adapted rowing at home vs. in community gyms

, , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Received 13 Sep 2023, Accepted 25 May 2024, Published online: 01 Jul 2024
 

Abstract

Purpose

Wheelchair users experience many barriers to physical activity as affordable and accessible exercise equipment options are limited. Thus, the home-based adapted rower (aROW) and gym-based aROW were developed. The objectives were to determine: 1) wheelchair users’ preferences, perspectives, facilitators, and barriers to using the home-based versus the gym-based aROW, 2) perceived usability of the home and gym aROWs, and 3) recommendations to adapt the aROW further for home and community use.

Materials and Methods

In this two-phase exploratory mixed-methods study, participants completed one month of using a home aROW, followed by one month of using a community gym aROW. After each phase, participants completed a semi-structured interview and the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire. Interview data were analyzed using conventional content analysis and effect size comparing SUS data was calculated.

Results and Conclusions

Four categories were identified: what worked well, barriers to using the aROWs, what could be improved and important considerations. There was a large effect size in perceived usability between the aROWs with participants preferring the home aROW. Overall, rowing was enjoyable, and participants achieved positive physical outcomes. As preferences are individual, the home aROW provides wheelchair users with a potential choice between home or gym exercise.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

  • Rowing is an enjoyable and effective form of aerobic exercise for wheelchair users

  • Wheelchair users experience social, environment and financial barriers to engaging in exercise

  • The home aROW provides a low-cost and accessible option for wheelchair-adapted aerobic exercise

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The data generated and analyzed during the study are available from the authors on request.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Rick Hansen Foundation under an ICORD seed grant.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 340.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.