1,034
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The production of scholarly knowledge in the global market arena: University ranking systems, prestige and power

Pages 245-259 | Received 22 Jan 2013, Accepted 16 Mar 2013, Published online: 24 Apr 2013
 

Abstract

The relationships between disciplines and the institutions within which they are situated is a fertile area for researching the shaping of sociological knowledge. Applying theoretical insights from the sociology of knowledge, this article draws on an empirical study of research publications in the sociology of health and medicine to show which institutions in the Australian context are most likely to use sociological theory. When the institutions are positioned within the global university ranking system, an inverse association between sociological theory and the relative wealth and prestige of the originating institution becomes evident. Some of the implications of this finding are discussed with reference to the on-going viability of disciplines.

Notes

1. 1. Colleges of Advanced Education were a creation of the Menzies government. Initially Teachers Colleges, they eventually broadened their offerings to award diplomas and certificates in subjects such as pharmacy. Institutes of Technology were also vocationally oriented institutions, focusing on the applied sciences, electronics and technology.

2. 2. The Shanghai Jiao Tong University Academic Ranking of World Universities can be found at http://www.shanghairanking.com/FieldSOC2011.html.

3. 3. The Times Higher Education rankings can be found at http:www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings.

4. 4. The methodology for the Quacquarelli Symonds rankings can be found at: http://www.topuniversities.com/world-university-rankings/understanding-qs-world-university-rankings-methodology. The QS World University Rankings system collaborated with The Times until 2010, at which point they parted with considerable animosity. Both offer essentially the same methodology, ostensibly measuring performance according to subject area.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Fran Collyer

Fran Collyer is a sociologist at the University of Sydney, National Convenor of the Health Section of The Australian Sociological Association, a member of the Health Governance Network, and former editor of the Health Sociology Review. Fran publishes in the fields of the sociology of science, technology, history and health and is co-author of Public Enterprise Divestment: Australian Case Studies (2001) and author of Mapping the Sociology of Health and Medicine (2012).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 230.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.