730
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Quiescence stabilizes predator–prey relations

&
Pages 196-208 | Received 26 Mar 2008, Published online: 04 Dec 2010

Figures & data

Figure 1. Three phase planes for the MacArthur–Rosenzweig system (solid) and the corresponding system with quiescence (dashed, trajectories have been projected from four dimensions onto the u, v-plane). In each case, the MR system has a limit cycle. Left (just inside the stability region): the system with quiescence has a stable stationary point. Centre (deep inside the stability region): rapid convergence to stationary point. Right (outside the stability region): both systems have limit cycles. The projected limit cycle of the quiescent system is much smaller than that of the MR system.

Figure 1. Three phase planes for the MacArthur–Rosenzweig system (solid) and the corresponding system with quiescence (dashed, trajectories have been projected from four dimensions onto the u, v-plane). In each case, the MR system has a limit cycle. Left (just inside the stability region): the system with quiescence has a stable stationary point. Centre (deep inside the stability region): rapid convergence to stationary point. Right (outside the stability region): both systems have limit cycles. The projected limit cycle of the quiescent system is much smaller than that of the MR system.

Figure 2. The τ, δ-plane with the null set of the cubic F and the second and third of the linear Hurwitz conditions (dashed). Quiescence leads to an enlarged stability domain that comprises the second quadrant and also the part of the first quadrant between the δ-axis and the upper branch of the null set. Broadly speaking, this domain gets larger when p 1, p 2 are increased. Case 1a. p 1=0.5, p 2=0.35, q 1=0.6, q 2=0.85, p<z 1<z 2. The first branch runs monotonely from (0, 0) to the vertical asymptote. Case 1b. p 1=1, p 2=0.5, q 1=0.2, q 2=0.5, z 1<p<z 2. The first branch runs monotonely from (0, 0) to the vertical asymptote. Case 2. p 1=1.1, p 2=1.5, q 1=0.9, q 2=0.15, z 1<z 2<p. The first branch runs from (0, 0) upward, crosses the vertical asymptote, turns back, and approaches the asymptote.

Figure 2. The τ, δ-plane with the null set of the cubic F and the second and third of the linear Hurwitz conditions (dashed). Quiescence leads to an enlarged stability domain that comprises the second quadrant and also the part of the first quadrant between the δ-axis and the upper branch of the null set. Broadly speaking, this domain gets larger when p 1, p 2 are increased. Case 1a. p 1=0.5, p 2=0.35, q 1=0.6, q 2=0.85, p<z 1<z 2. The first branch runs monotonely from (0, 0) to the vertical asymptote. Case 1b. p 1=1, p 2=0.5, q 1=0.2, q 2=0.5, z 1<p<z 2. The first branch runs monotonely from (0, 0) to the vertical asymptote. Case 2. p 1=1.1, p 2=1.5, q 1=0.9, q 2=0.15, z 1<z 2<p. The first branch runs from (0, 0) upward, crosses the vertical asymptote, turns back, and approaches the asymptote.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.