784
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Dynamics of a multi-strain malaria model with diffusion in a periodic environment

, &
Pages 766-815 | Received 01 Jun 2022, Accepted 31 Oct 2022, Published online: 22 Nov 2022

Figures & data

Table 1. The potential dynamical outcomes of system (Equation6).

Figure 1. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes when R1<1 and R2<1. (a) The evolution of u1. (b) Then evolution of u4. (c) Then evolution of u2. (d) Then evolution of u5.

Figure 1. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes when R1<1 and R2<1. (a) The evolution of u1. (b) Then evolution of u4. (c) Then evolution of u2. (d) Then evolution of u5.

Figure 2. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes when R1<1 and R2>1. (a) The evolution of u1. (b) The evolution of u4. (c) The evolution of u2. (d) The evolution of u5.

Figure 2. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes when R1<1 and R2>1. (a) The evolution of u1. (b) The evolution of u4. (c) The evolution of u2. (d) The evolution of u5.

Figure 3. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes when R1>1 and R2>1. (a) The evolution of u1. (b) Then evolution of u4. (c) Then evolution of u2. (d) Then evolution of u5.

Figure 3. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes when R1>1 and R2>1. (a) The evolution of u1. (b) Then evolution of u4. (c) Then evolution of u2. (d) Then evolution of u5.

Figure 4. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes when R1>1 and R2>1. (a) The evolution of u1. (b) The evolution of u4. (c) The evolution of u2. (d) The evolution of u5.

Figure 4. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes when R1>1 and R2>1. (a) The evolution of u1. (b) The evolution of u4. (c) The evolution of u2. (d) The evolution of u5.

Figure 5. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes when R1>1 and R2>1. (a) The evolution of u1. (b) The evolution of u4. (c) The evolution of u2. (d) The evolution of u5.

Figure 5. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes when R1>1 and R2>1. (a) The evolution of u1. (b) The evolution of u4. (c) The evolution of u2. (d) The evolution of u5.

Figure 6. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes when Dh=0 and Dv=0. (a) The evolution of u1. (b) The evolution of u4. (c) The evolution of u2. (d) The evolution of u5.

Figure 6. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes when Dh=0 and Dv=0. (a) The evolution of u1. (b) The evolution of u4. (c) The evolution of u2. (d) The evolution of u5.

Figure 7. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes with Dh=0 and Dv=0.0125. (a) The evolution of u1. (b) The evolution of u4. (c) The evolution of u2. (d) The evolution of u5.

Figure 7. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes with Dh=0 and Dv=0.0125. (a) The evolution of u1. (b) The evolution of u4. (c) The evolution of u2. (d) The evolution of u5.

Figure 8. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes with Dh=0.1 and Dv=0. (a) The evolution of u1. (b) The evolution of u4. (c) The evolution of u2. (d) The evolution of u5.

Figure 8. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes with Dh=0.1 and Dv=0. (a) The evolution of u1. (b) The evolution of u4. (c) The evolution of u2. (d) The evolution of u5.

Figure 9. Increasing medical resources in the environment of spatial heterogeneity and its influence on the R1.

Figure 9. Increasing medical resources in the environment of spatial heterogeneity and its influence on the R1.

Figure 10. For fixed medical resources, the spatial distribution of ϱ1 and the corresponding value of R1.

Figure 10. For fixed medical resources, the spatial distribution of ϱ1 and the corresponding value of R1.

Figure 11. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes with different vector-bias parameter. Among them, green indicates that there is a vector-bias effect (l/p=3/4), and red indicates that there is no vector-bias effect (l/p=1). (a) With vector-bias effect. (b) Without vector-bias effect. (c) With vector-bias effect. (d) Without vector-bias effect.

Figure 11. The evolution of infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes with different vector-bias parameter. Among them, green indicates that there is a vector-bias effect (l/p=3/4), and red indicates that there is no vector-bias effect (l/p=1). (a) With vector-bias effect. (b) Without vector-bias effect. (c) With vector-bias effect. (d) Without vector-bias effect.

Figure 12. The evolution infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes with seasonal temperature changes and without seasonal temperature changes. Among them, red indicates that the parameters depend on temperature, and green indicates that the parameters do not depend on temperature.

Figure 12. The evolution infection compartments of humans and mosquitoes with seasonal temperature changes and without seasonal temperature changes. Among them, red indicates that the parameters depend on temperature, and green indicates that the parameters do not depend on temperature.

Figure A1. A small interval of development level of infection.

Figure A1. A small interval of development level of infection.

Figure A2. The parameters change with time. (a) Change of contact rate β(t) with time. (b) Change of EIP τ1(t) with time. (c) Change of the death rate of mosquitoes μv(t) with time.

Figure A2. The parameters change with time. (a) Change of contact rate β(t) with time. (b) Change of EIP τ1(t) with time. (c) Change of the death rate of mosquitoes μv(t) with time.

Table F1. Definition and value of parameters.