1,615
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Stationary distribution and global stability of stochastic predator-prey model with disease in prey population

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2164803 | Received 15 Sep 2021, Accepted 29 Dec 2022, Published online: 17 Jan 2023

Figures & data

Table 1. Parameters and meaning – predator-prey model with disease in the first prey.

Figure 1. (a) This graph shows that the solution curve of deterministic (Equation2) and stochastic system (Equation4) with large noise σ1=σ2=0.06,σ3=σ4=0.03 and (b) small noise σ1=σ2=0.03,σ3=σ4=0.01.

Figure 1. (a) This graph shows that the solution curve of deterministic (Equation2(2) {dXSdt=ΠXSa+XS−αXSXI−bXS,dXIdt=αXSXI−βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−cXI,dYdt=γY−δYZ−dY,dZdt=δYZ+βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−eZ,(2) ) and stochastic system (Equation4(4) {dXSdt=ΠXSa+XS−αXSXI−bXS+σ1XSB1(t),dXIdt=αXSXI−βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−cXI+σ2XIB2(t),dYdt=γY−δYZ−dY+σ3YB3(t),dZdt=δYZ+βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−eZ+σ4ZB4(t).(4) ) with large noise σ1=σ2=0.06,σ3=σ4=0.03 and (b) small noise σ1=σ2=0.03,σ3=σ4=0.01.

Figure 2. (a) This graph shows that the species of system (Equation2) and (Equation4) goes to extinction and (b) each species in both system goes to permanent.

Figure 2. (a) This graph shows that the species of system (Equation2(2) {dXSdt=ΠXSa+XS−αXSXI−bXS,dXIdt=αXSXI−βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−cXI,dYdt=γY−δYZ−dY,dZdt=δYZ+βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−eZ,(2) ) and (Equation4(4) {dXSdt=ΠXSa+XS−αXSXI−bXS+σ1XSB1(t),dXIdt=αXSXI−βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−cXI+σ2XIB2(t),dYdt=γY−δYZ−dY+σ3YB3(t),dZdt=δYZ+βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−eZ+σ4ZB4(t).(4) ) goes to extinction and (b) each species in both system goes to permanent.

Figure 3. This graph shows the stochastic stability of the system (Equation4) around the positive equilibrium with different initial values and σ1=0.04,σ2=0.03,σ3=0.02,σ4=0.01.

Figure 3. This graph shows the stochastic stability of the system (Equation4(4) {dXSdt=ΠXSa+XS−αXSXI−bXS+σ1XSB1(t),dXIdt=αXSXI−βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−cXI+σ2XIB2(t),dYdt=γY−δYZ−dY+σ3YB3(t),dZdt=δYZ+βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−eZ+σ4ZB4(t).(4) ) around the positive equilibrium with different initial values and σ1=0.04,σ2=0.03,σ3=0.02,σ4=0.01.

Figure 4. The phase trajectories clearly shows the stochastic stability of individual species in the system (Equation4) with different initial values and with the noise σ1=0.04,σ2=0.03,σ3=0.02,σ4=0.01 converges to the region where the positive equilibrium occur.

Figure 4. The phase trajectories clearly shows the stochastic stability of individual species in the system (Equation4(4) {dXSdt=ΠXSa+XS−αXSXI−bXS+σ1XSB1(t),dXIdt=αXSXI−βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−cXI+σ2XIB2(t),dYdt=γY−δYZ−dY+σ3YB3(t),dZdt=δYZ+βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−eZ+σ4ZB4(t).(4) ) with different initial values and with the noise σ1=0.04,σ2=0.03,σ3=0.02,σ4=0.01 converges to the region where the positive equilibrium occur.

Figure 5. The left panel shows the solution trajectories of both deterministic and stochastic systems from one simulation run; the right panel shows the stationary distribution of each species in the system (Equation4) separately from 10,000 simulation runs with intensity of noise σ1=σ2=0.03,σ3=σ4=0.01.

Figure 5. The left panel shows the solution trajectories of both deterministic and stochastic systems from one simulation run; the right panel shows the stationary distribution of each species in the system (Equation4(4) {dXSdt=ΠXSa+XS−αXSXI−bXS+σ1XSB1(t),dXIdt=αXSXI−βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−cXI+σ2XIB2(t),dYdt=γY−δYZ−dY+σ3YB3(t),dZdt=δYZ+βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−eZ+σ4ZB4(t).(4) ) separately from 10,000 simulation runs with intensity of noise σ1=σ2=0.03,σ3=σ4=0.01.

Figure 6. The left panel represents the solution trajectories of both system from one simulation run; the right panel represents the stationary distribution of each species in the system (Equation4) separately from 10,000 simulation run with intensity of noise σ1=σ2=0.06,σ3=σ4=0.03.

Figure 6. The left panel represents the solution trajectories of both system from one simulation run; the right panel represents the stationary distribution of each species in the system (Equation4(4) {dXSdt=ΠXSa+XS−αXSXI−bXS+σ1XSB1(t),dXIdt=αXSXI−βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−cXI+σ2XIB2(t),dYdt=γY−δYZ−dY+σ3YB3(t),dZdt=δYZ+βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−eZ+σ4ZB4(t).(4) ) separately from 10,000 simulation run with intensity of noise σ1=σ2=0.06,σ3=σ4=0.03.

Figure 7. (a) This graph presents the distribution of all species of system (Equation4) in one picture with intensity of small noise σ1=σ2=0.03,σ3=σ4=0.01 and (b) large noise σ1=σ2=0.06,σ3=σ4=0.03.

Figure 7. (a) This graph presents the distribution of all species of system (Equation4(4) {dXSdt=ΠXSa+XS−αXSXI−bXS+σ1XSB1(t),dXIdt=αXSXI−βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−cXI+σ2XIB2(t),dYdt=γY−δYZ−dY+σ3YB3(t),dZdt=δYZ+βXIZm+μXI+ηZ−eZ+σ4ZB4(t).(4) ) in one picture with intensity of small noise σ1=σ2=0.03,σ3=σ4=0.01 and (b) large noise σ1=σ2=0.06,σ3=σ4=0.03.

Data availability statement

Our paper contains numerical experimental results, and values for these experiments are included in the paper. The data is freely available.