![Sample our Politics & International Relations journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5947/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Politics-International-Relations.jpg"})
Abstract
This paper considers how the dynamics of a series of conflicts influence policy making and learning from experience. Two different series of conflicts centered on housing and public space are described and compared. First is the series of crises around illegal squatter settlements and fires that resulted in the Squatter Resettlement Programme, which eventually became a broad-ranging public housing programme accommodating half of Hong Kong's population. Second is a series of conflicts around post-1997 restructuring of urban space and public housing, which produced a number of setbacks for government plans. The first conflicts are interpreted as producing a learning process where initial responses failed to resolve the problems, failures demonstrated by subsequent crises, prompting new initiatives, eventually resulting in a partial solution through the adoption of permanent multi-storey Resettlement blocks. The second set of conflicts has revolved around public perceptions of a tight government/property developer nexus that drives public policies in detrimental ways. While the current set of conflicts has not been resolved yet, this paper will consider whether a similar learning process can be discerned. As yet, it appears that the opponents of government policy have been learning from their successes more than the government has from their setbacks.
Acknowledgements
Part of this research reported in this article was supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Standard Research Grant. Useful suggestions and comments on earlier versions of the issues addressed here were offered by the H15 Support Group, James Lee, Yip Ngai-ming, Helen Siu, Tammy Wong, Ray Forrest and members of the audience of a panel at the Asia Pacific Housing Research Network conference in Seoul.