8,723
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Coach me if you can! Dark triad clients, their effect on coaches, and how coaches deal with them

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 110-126 | Received 17 Jul 2019, Accepted 16 Jun 2020, Published online: 15 Aug 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1. Process mediation analysis: How dark triad leaders influence the coach and coaching.

Note. Standard regression coefficients with the standard errors in the brackets are depicted with significant pathways being highlighted by thick arrow lines and the significance level (***p < .001; **p < .01; *p < .05). Non-significant pathways and independent variables are shown with dotted (arrow) lines. Direct effect: t(63) = 0.47, p = .642; total effect: t(63) = −0.24, p = .808; effect of leadership level on the perceived client’s dark triad score: t(63) = 2.62, p = .011.

Figure 1. Process mediation analysis: How dark triad leaders influence the coach and coaching.Note. Standard regression coefficients with the standard errors in the brackets are depicted with significant pathways being highlighted by thick arrow lines and the significance level (***p < .001; **p < .01; *p < .05). Non-significant pathways and independent variables are shown with dotted (arrow) lines. Direct effect: t(63) = 0.47, p = .642; total effect: t(63) = −0.24, p = .808; effect of leadership level on the perceived client’s dark triad score: t(63) = 2.62, p = .011.

Figure 2. Process mediation analysis: How dark triad leaders influence the coach and coaching.

Note. Standard regression coefficients with the standard errors in the brackets are depicted with significant pathways being highlighted by thick arrow lines and the significance level (***p < .001; ** p < .01; *p < .05). Non-significant pathways and independent variables are shown with dotted (arrow) lines. Direct effect: t(63) = −1.23, p = .206; total effect: t(63) = −1.33, p = .187; effect of leadership level on the perceived client’s dark triad score: t(63) = 2.62, p = .011.

Figure 2. Process mediation analysis: How dark triad leaders influence the coach and coaching.Note. Standard regression coefficients with the standard errors in the brackets are depicted with significant pathways being highlighted by thick arrow lines and the significance level (***p < .001; ** p < .01; *p < .05). Non-significant pathways and independent variables are shown with dotted (arrow) lines. Direct effect: t(63) = −1.23, p = .206; total effect: t(63) = −1.33, p = .187; effect of leadership level on the perceived client’s dark triad score: t(63) = 2.62, p = .011.

Figure 3. Process mediation analysis: How the coach’s approach motivation influences coaching.

Note. Standard regression coefficients with the standard errors in the brackets are depicted with significant pathways being highlighted by thick arrow lines and the significance level (***p < .001; ** p < .01; * p < .05). Non-significant pathways and independent variables are shown with dotted (arrow) lines. Direct effect: t(63) = −1.23, p = .206; total effect: t(63) = 1.96, p = .054.

Figure 3. Process mediation analysis: How the coach’s approach motivation influences coaching.Note. Standard regression coefficients with the standard errors in the brackets are depicted with significant pathways being highlighted by thick arrow lines and the significance level (***p < .001; ** p < .01; * p < .05). Non-significant pathways and independent variables are shown with dotted (arrow) lines. Direct effect: t(63) = −1.23, p = .206; total effect: t(63) = 1.96, p = .054.

Table 1. Qualitative data for successful strategies that were named more than once and were not named among the unsuccessful strategies, ordered by dark triad tendency.

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (19.4 KB)