Publication Cover
Psychosis
Psychological, Social and Integrative Approaches
Volume 1, 2009 - Issue 2
3,626
Views
208
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR): A measurement tool developed in collaboration with service users

, , , , , & show all
Pages 145-155 | Received 13 Dec 2009, Accepted 21 Mar 2009, Published online: 27 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Aims: To develop and validate a short recovery questionnaire in collaboration with service users.

Method: 126 people with experience of psychosis were recruited via the National Health Service (NHS) Trust and self‐help organisations nationwide. Items were generated from in‐depth interviews into recovery and developed into a 25‐item self‐report questionnaire. Data were factor analysed, and a final 22‐item measure (the QPR) was tested for reliability and validity. To assess validity the QPR was administered together with measures of: psychological distress (the General Health Questionnaire – GHQ); empowerment (the Making Decisions and Empowerment Scale – MDES), and quality of life (the Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale – SQLS). The QPR was administered again at two weeks to assess reliability.

Results: The QPR is comprised of two subscales (intrapersonal and interpersonal). Internal consistency and reliability of the scale was satisfactory. There was a high level of association with MDES, GHQ and SQLS scores, and between QPR scores at time one and time two.

Conclusions: The QPR possesses internal consistency, construct validity and reliability, and promises to be a useful tool for assisting clients to set goals, evaluation of these goals and promoting recovery from psychosis in routine service evaluation and research trials.

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted in collaboration with service users and the Bolton Salford and Trafford research Steering Committee. This research was supported by a grant from the Division of Clinical Psychology, University of Liverpool and was undertaken as part of a DClin Psychol Programme by STN. Ethical approval was granted by Bolton Salford and Trafford Ethics Committee. Thanks to Ros Bramwell for her statistical support and to Rory Allot for his comments.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 193.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.