Community-based natural resources management in Eritrea and Ethiopia: toward a comparative institutional analysis

Abstract

Community-based natural resources management (CNRM), which emphasizes community empowerment, participation and enhanced use of indigenous knowledge in resources and environmental management, is an increasingly popular discourse for sustainable development in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite its popularity, CNRM faces various discursive and institutional challenges in countries with a recent history of top-down development. This paper provides a comparative examination of the specific historical, ideological and political contexts behind discourses, policies and institutions for and against community-based resources and environmental management in Ethiopia and Eritrea. There is a need for greater emphasis on communal rights to pastoral, agricultural and forest resources, in contrast to the continued support for a neo-Malthusian dispensation of environmental rehabilitation or reclamation which still reigns supreme in both Eritrea and Ethiopia.

Keywords:

• resource management
• community rights
• neo-Malthusianism
• Eritrea
• Ethiopia

Notes

1. Agrawal, “Common Property Institutions,” 1649–72; Haque, “Environmental Discourse and Sustainable Development.”.

2. Tache and Irwin, Traditional Institutions, Multiple Stakeholders; United States Institute of Peace, Terrorism in the Horn of Africa.

3. Around 70 million people in the Horn endured extreme food shortages at least once every decade over the past 30 years: FAO, Human Catastrophe Looms ; Mengisteab and Ogbazghi, Anatomy of an African Tragedy.

4. Leach, Mearns and Scoones, “Environmental Entitlements,” 225–47.

5. For institutional limitations of CNRM in Africa, see Turner, “Conflict, Environmental Change,” 643–57; Agrawal and Gibson, “Enchantment and Disenchantment,” 629–49; Kellert et al., “Community Natural Resource Management,” 705–15; Cernea and Bromley, Management of Common Property Natural Resources.

6. Feeny et al., “Tragedy of the Commons,” 1–19; Ostrom, Governing the Commons.

7. Hardin, “Tragedy of the Commons”; Repetto and Holmes, “Role of Population.”

8. Ostrom, Governing the Commons; Bromley, Making the Commons Work.

9. Kibreab, “Property Rights,” 57–108.

10. Swallow and Bromley, “Institutions, Governance and Incentives,” 99–118; Folke et al., “Resilience and Sustainable Development,” 437–40; United Nations General Assembly, “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development.”

11. Ribot, “Decentralization, Participation and Accountability,” 23–65; Ribot, Waiting for Democracy.

12. Leach, Mearns and Scoones, “Environmental Entitlements,” 225–47; Agrawal, “Common Property Institutions,” 1649–72.

13. Agrawal and Ostrom, “Collective Action, Property Rights and Decentralization,” 485–514.

14. Murphree, Communities as Resource Management Institutions; and Ribot, “Representation, Citizenship and the Public Domain,” 43–9; Black and Weston, “Local Community, Legitimacy, and Cultural Authenticity in Post Natural Resource Management,” 263–82.

15. Kellert et al., “Community Natural Resource Management,” 705–15.

16. Agrawal and Gibson. “Enchantment and Disenchantment,” 629–49; Berkes, “Rethinking Community-Based Conservation,” 621–30; Oelschlaeger, Postmodern Environmental Ethics.17. Singleton, ‘‘Cooperation or Capture?’’.

17. Singleton, “Cooperation or Capture?”

18. Ostrom et al., “Revisiting the Commons,” 278–82.

19. Agrawal and Gibson. “Enchantment and Disenchantment”; Leach, Mearns and Scoones, “Environmental Entitlements”; Kellert et al., “Community Natural Resource Management.”

20. Ribot, “Representation, Citizenship and the Public Domain,” 43–9.

21. Agrawal and Ostrom, “Collective Action, Property Rights and Decentralization,” 485–514.

22. Keeley and Scoones, “Knowledge, Power, and Politics.”

23. For a summary of the emerging institutionalist view of CNRM, see Agrawal “Enchantment and Disenchantment,” 629–49.

24. Leach, Mearns and Scoones, “Environmental Entitlements.”

25. Cleaver, “Moral Ecological Rationality,” 361–83.

26. There are three branches of New Institutionalism: Rational Choice Institutionalism, Sociological Institutionalism and Historical Institutionalism. For a summary, see Immergut, “The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism,” 5–34.

27. North, Institutions, 3.

28. North, Institutions, 3.

29. Cleaver, “Moral Ecological Rationality,” 361–83.

30. Skocpol, “Bringing the State Back.” See also Evans, “The State and Economic Transformation.”

31. Roe et al., Evaluating Eden; Brosius and Tsing, “Representing Communities,” 157–68.

32. Tekle, Eritrea and Ethiopia; Iyob, “The Ethiopian–Eritrean Conflict,” 659–82.

33. Ottaway, Africa's New Leaders.

34. Negash and Tronvoll, Brothers at War.

35. Mengisteab, “New Approaches to State Building in Africa,” 111–32; Mengisteab, “Ethiopia's Ethnic-Based Federalism,” 20–25; Aalen, Ethnic Federalism in a Dominant Party State.

36. Bariagaber, “The Politics of Cultural Pluralism,” 1056–69.

37. Bariagaber, “The Politics of Cultural Pluralism,” 1056–69. “Creating a Constitution for Eritrea.”

38. Satishkumar, Weldesemaet and Asfaw, “Civil Society Participation.”

39. Keeley and Scoones, “Knowledge, Power, and Politics.”

40. Welde Giorgis, Red Tears.

41. Critical discourses of Ethiopian history illuminate the problematic nature of the Ethiopian state project. The Ethiopian state has rarely been a champion of freedom because it has subjugated numerous nationalities and ethnic minorities. See Jalata, Oromia and Ethiopia.

42. Kamara et al., “Policies, Interventions and Institutional Change,” 381–403 ; Legesse Gada: Three Approaches to the Study of African Society; Legesse, Oromo Democracy.

43. Clay and Holcomb, “Politics and the Ethiopian Famine.”

44. Keeley and Scoones, “Knowledge, Power, and Politics,” 95.

45. Keeley and Scoones, “Knowledge, Power, and Politics,” 95.

46. Nyssen et al., “Environmental Policy in Ethiopia: A Rejoinder to Keeley and Scoones,” 137–47.

47. Keeley and Scoones, “Knowledge, Power, and Politics,” 95.

48. Ashenafi and Williams, “Indigenous Common Property Resource Management,” 539–63; Kebede, “Land Tenure and Common Pool Resources,” 113–49.

49. Watson, “Examining the Potential of Indigenous Institutions,” 287–309.

50. Kebebew, Tsegaye and Synnevag, Traditional Coping Strategies.

51. Shehim, “Ethiopia, Revolution, and the Question of Nationalities,” 331–48.

52. Bondestam, “People and Capitalism,” 423–39.

53. Kloos, “Development, Drought, and Famine,” 21–48.

54. Kebebew, Tsegaye and Synnevag, Traditional Coping Strategies.

55. Deininger et al., Tenure Security.

56. Peasant Associations were authorized to give or take away land without compensation: Dejene, Environment, Famine, and Politics; Keller, “Drought, War, and the Politics of Famine,” 609–24.

57. Getachew, “An Overview of Root Causes”; Homann et al., Potentials and Constraints Oba, Assessment of Indigenous Range Management Knowledge.

58. Vaughan and Tronvoll, The Culture of Power, 10; Pausewang et al., Ethiopia Since the Derg.

59. Henze, “A Political Success Story,” 40–54; Henze, Layers of Time.

60. Mengisteab, “New Approaches to State Building in Africa,” 111–32; Mengisteab, “Ethiopia's Ethnic-Based Federalism,” 20–5; Aalen, Ethnic Federalism in a Dominant Party State.

61. Keeley and Scoones, “Knowledge, Power, and Politics”

62. Harbeson, “A Bureaucratic Authoritarian Regime,” 62–9; Latta, “Ethiopia: The Path to War, and the Consequences of Peace,” 37–56; Latta, Ethiopian State at the Crossroads.

63. Keeley and Scoones. “Knowledge, Power, and Politics.”

64. Keeley and Scoones. “Knowledge, Power, and Politics.”

65. Harrison, “The Problem with the Locals,” 587–610.

66. Keeley and Scoones, “Knowledge, Power, and Politics.”

67. Keeley and Scoones, “Knowledge, Power, and Politics.”

68. Bewket, “The Need for a Participatory Approach,” 43–68.

69. Keeley and Scoones, “Knowledge, Power, and Politics.”

70. Ethiopia is estimated to have received roughly US$17 billion in official development assistance between 1980 and 1997. Abegaz, “Aid and Reform in Ethiopia,” 1–2.

71. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, 3rd National Report.

72. Shiferaw and Holden. “Soil Erosion and Smallholders’ Conservation Decisions,” 739–52. Eweg et al., “Analyzing Degradation and Rehabilitation,” 529–42.

73. Vaughan and Tronvoll, The Culture of Power.

74. Vaughan and Tronvoll, The Culture of Power.

75. Dejene, Integrated Natural Resources Management.

76. Dejene, Integrated Natural Resources Management.

77. Dejene, Integrated Natural Resources Management.

78. Castellani, Recent Developments in Land Tenure Law.

79. For more on Tigrinya land tenure systems, see Castellani, Recent Developments in Land Tenure.

80. Tikabo, “Land Tenure.”

81. Joireman, “The Minefield of Land Reform,” 269–85.

82. Joireman, “The Minefield of Land Reform,” 269–85.

83. Castellani, Recent Developments in Land Tenure Law.

84. Pool, From Guerrillas to Government; Tronvoll, “The Process of Nation-Building in Postwar Eritrea”; Reid, “Caught in the Headlights of History.”

85. Tikabo, “Land Tenure”; Joireman, “The Minefield of Land Reform,” 269–85.

86. Pool, From Guerrillas to Government.

87. The EPLF changed its name to the Peoples Front for Democracy and Justice (PFDJ) at this first post-independence congress.

88. Castellani, Recent Developments in Land Tenure Law.

89. Bariagaber, “The Politics of Cultural Pluralism,” 1056–69; Scott, Seeing Like a State.

90. Mengsiteab, “Ethiopia's Ethnic-Based Federalism,” 20–5.

91. Pool, From Guerrillas to Government.

92. Murtaz, The Pillage of Sustainability in Eritrea; Tesfamichael, Poverty and Natural Resources Management in the Central Highlands of Eritrea.

93. Joireman, “The Minefield of Land Reform,” 269–85.

94. Joireman, “The Minefield of Land Reform,” 269–85. Bariagaber, Conflict and the Refugee Experience.

95. Naty, “Environment, Society, and the State in Western Eritrea,” 569–97.

96. Whether large-scale and aggressive agricultural policy is a viable path to food security for a country with predominantly arid and semi–arid ecosystem is subject to debate.

97. Naty, “Environment, Society, and the State in Western Eritrea,” 569–97.

98. Mehari, Schultz and Depeweg, “Where Indigenous Water Management Practices Overcome Failures of Structures.”

99. Government of Eritrea, National Environmental Management Plan for Eritrea.