Figures & data
Table 1. Activities within the operational emergency management demanding spatial operations.
Table 2. A map handling overview.
Figure 1. Original (left) and current (right) types of visualization used in GiSel IZS (from Skrivanek et al. 2009).
![Figure 1. Original (left) and current (right) types of visualization used in GiSel IZS (from Skrivanek et al. 2009).](/cms/asset/c630e150-d220-43a9-9d64-abc6c19d9d97/tjde_a_484511_o_f0001g.jpg)
Figure 3. Finding the way: by road atlas (part of the common knowledge; left), in an emergency management-oriented environment (expert knowledge; right).
![Figure 3. Finding the way: by road atlas (part of the common knowledge; left), in an emergency management-oriented environment (expert knowledge; right).](/cms/asset/c704b687-8992-4821-804b-db92710a2b93/tjde_a_484511_o_f0003g.jpg)
Figure 4. Comparison of the map with full-scale topography (left) and with strongly reduced features (right).
![Figure 4. Comparison of the map with full-scale topography (left) and with strongly reduced features (right).](/cms/asset/4d725b51-fa57-464f-a1b6-097e55231553/tjde_a_484511_o_f0004g.jpg)
Table 3. Incident classification for emergency calls.
Figure 5. Example of two different contexts (visualization for transport of dangerous cargo: monitoring (left) and incident (right)).
![Figure 5. Example of two different contexts (visualization for transport of dangerous cargo: monitoring (left) and incident (right)).](/cms/asset/c09dd1a8-027f-4d64-ae39-dbfcaff487b6/tjde_a_484511_o_f0005g.jpg)