Figures & data
Figure 1. Map of the study area and the distribution of the WSN nodes (projection: WGS_1984_UTM_Zone_47N)
![Figure 1. Map of the study area and the distribution of the WSN nodes (projection: WGS_1984_UTM_Zone_47N)](/cms/asset/2283a9bc-f509-4619-9b99-b570b57e5222/tjde_a_1334097_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Time series of surface albedo over different surface types and the same surface type. (a) Time series of albedos from a cornfield, a building, an orchard, and a vegetable field. (b) Albedo values from different cornfields.
![Figure 2. Time series of surface albedo over different surface types and the same surface type. (a) Time series of albedos from a cornfield, a building, an orchard, and a vegetable field. (b) Albedo values from different cornfields.](/cms/asset/6063cda5-6f1f-4ffe-828c-1952e2d74c70/tjde_a_1334097_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 1. List of coarse-scale albedo products used in this study.
Figure 3. Flowchart of the proposed method for establishing the spatiotemporal trend surface and the corresponding upscaling method.
![Figure 3. Flowchart of the proposed method for establishing the spatiotemporal trend surface and the corresponding upscaling method.](/cms/asset/79abb004-d051-466d-9671-18a44baadcd5/tjde_a_1334097_f0003_b.gif)
Figure 4. The OLS regression model between the CASI albedo and ground-based albedo and the results of a significance test.
![Figure 4. The OLS regression model between the CASI albedo and ground-based albedo and the results of a significance test.](/cms/asset/0df91460-ccd7-42c7-91f4-ebe2540c15ee/tjde_a_1334097_f0004_b.gif)
Figure 5. The OLS regression models’ coefficients between the WSN-based albedos for each two neighbouring clear days.
![Figure 5. The OLS regression models’ coefficients between the WSN-based albedos for each two neighbouring clear days.](/cms/asset/d53e73c4-ca38-4eea-9729-8b68e58c7165/tjde_a_1334097_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6. The R2 and significance test results of the OLS regression models between the WSN observed albedo on each two neighbouring clear days.
![Figure 6. The R2 and significance test results of the OLS regression models between the WSN observed albedo on each two neighbouring clear days.](/cms/asset/c303cb2c-e626-418b-8bf3-ac7fc6c62caf/tjde_a_1334097_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 7. The spatial consistency between the trend surface and the ground-based measurements over the WSN nodes. Only the results for the initial and final days are shown for conciseness.
![Figure 7. The spatial consistency between the trend surface and the ground-based measurements over the WSN nodes. Only the results for the initial and final days are shown for conciseness.](/cms/asset/d9722c4a-0902-48b2-bdc6-78b7025bf8e0/tjde_a_1334097_f0007_c.jpg)
Figure 8. The temporal consistency between the trend surface and the ground-based measurements over different land cover types during the study period. Only one node within a cornfield is shown for conciseness.
![Figure 8. The temporal consistency between the trend surface and the ground-based measurements over different land cover types during the study period. Only one node within a cornfield is shown for conciseness.](/cms/asset/82d42ef6-a2e0-4ddb-b589-7f5fc835a11a/tjde_a_1334097_f0008_c.jpg)
Figure 9. The trend surface (left) and the upscaling results with a 1-km grid (right) for the initial day (up) and the last clear day (down) during the study period.
![Figure 9. The trend surface (left) and the upscaling results with a 1-km grid (right) for the initial day (up) and the last clear day (down) during the study period.](/cms/asset/2535d629-f569-4093-a522-7cdc227aeaee/tjde_a_1334097_f0009_c.jpg)
Figure 10. The scatterplots between the upscaling results and albedo products during the study period (from left to right, MODIS (V006), GLASS and MuSyQ).
![Figure 10. The scatterplots between the upscaling results and albedo products during the study period (from left to right, MODIS (V006), GLASS and MuSyQ).](/cms/asset/9f44e564-6d3c-4bf2-b237-e413a684ccb1/tjde_a_1334097_f0010_c.jpg)