2,272
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The impact of seasonality on multi-scale feature extraction techniques

& ORCID Icon
Pages 9-21 | Received 30 Apr 2018, Accepted 28 Nov 2018, Published online: 16 Jan 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. Example of seasonal differences for Charlotte, North Carolina (United States) imagery. (a) Charlotte 01/24/2016 (Winter Season) and (b) Charlotte 07/05/2016 (Summer Season).

Figure 1. Example of seasonal differences for Charlotte, North Carolina (United States) imagery. (a) Charlotte 01/24/2016 (Winter Season) and (b) Charlotte 07/05/2016 (Summer Season).

Figure 2. Example of seasonal differences for Kano, Nigeria imagery. (a) Kano 01/27/2014 (Dry Season) and (b) Kano 08/29/2014 (Wet Season).

Figure 2. Example of seasonal differences for Kano, Nigeria imagery. (a) Kano 01/27/2014 (Dry Season) and (b) Kano 08/29/2014 (Wet Season).

Table 1. Imagery collection parameters.

Figure 3. Charlotte and Kano training blocks along with reference data (building features).

Figure 3. Charlotte and Kano training blocks along with reference data (building features).

Figure 4. Example of feature extraction during model creation for Charlotte 07/05/2016 image. (a) Isolated area downtown and (b) HOGGLCM extracted features for the area.

Figure 4. Example of feature extraction during model creation for Charlotte 07/05/2016 image. (a) Isolated area downtown and (b) HOGGLCM extracted features for the area.

Figure 5. Charlotte January feature run example.

Figure 5. Charlotte January feature run example.

Table 2. Significance of comprehensive differences.

Table 3. Significance of individual differences.

Figure 7. F1 score differences for seasons. (a) Charlotte F1 scores for seasons and (b) Kano F1 scores for seasons.

Figure 7. F1 score differences for seasons. (a) Charlotte F1 scores for seasons and (b) Kano F1 scores for seasons.

Figure 8. F1 score differences for features. (a) Charlotte F1 scores for features and (b) Kano F1 scores for features.

Figure 8. F1 score differences for features. (a) Charlotte F1 scores for features and (b) Kano F1 scores for features.

Figure 6. Example of VEGIND results. (a) Charlotte 07/05/2016 Run Number 14 and (b) Kano 08/29/2014 Run Number 9.

Figure 6. Example of VEGIND results. (a) Charlotte 07/05/2016 Run Number 14 and (b) Kano 08/29/2014 Run Number 9.

Figure 9. Seasonal impact on each feature. (a) Charlotte F1 score mean by season and (b) Kano F1 score mean by season.

Figure 9. Seasonal impact on each feature. (a) Charlotte F1 score mean by season and (b) Kano F1 score mean by season.

Table A1. VEGIND feature.

Table A2. Metric results for Charlotte (SD is standard deviation).

Table A3. Metric results for Kano (SD is standard deviation).