Figures & data
Table 1. Bandwidth and spatial resolution of MODIS and Landsat corresponding bands.
Table 2. R2 of two approaches at different depths and scales.
Table 3. RMSE () of two approaches at different depths and scales.
Table 4. MAE () of two approaches at different depths and scales.
Figure 4. Comparisons between the observed and predicted ST. (a) Scatter plot between observed and predicted ST, and (b) histogram of bias for predicted ST.
![Figure 4. Comparisons between the observed and predicted ST. (a) Scatter plot between observed and predicted ST, and (b) histogram of bias for predicted ST.](/cms/asset/9d126f5f-7164-4d55-904b-fe7c260ecabf/tjde_a_2264267_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of predicted annual mean ST at a depth of 5, 10, 20, and 40 cm in 2011, 2014, 2017, and 2020. (unit: ).
![Figure 7. Spatial distribution of predicted annual mean ST at a depth of 5, 10, 20, and 40 cm in 2011, 2014, 2017, and 2020. (unit: ∘C).](/cms/asset/113cedfb-56cd-4a56-b51a-568903826fb1/tjde_a_2264267_f0007_oc.jpg)
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in NASA MODIS Portal (https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/), USGS Landsat Portal (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/), the Global land surface satellite products (http://www.glass.umd.edu/index.html), the Tibetan Plateau Science Data Center, National Earth System Science Data Sharing Infrastructure, National Science & Technology Infrastructure of China (http://tibet.geodata.cn).