ABSTRACT
Child sexual abuse (CSA) is usually concealed by shame and secrecy, and it is often not disclosed for long periods or is not disclosed at all. Lack of disclosure has profound implications for prevention, treatment, and science. Gender is often assumed to be a factor in disclosure rates. Although empirical investigations of the role of gender in the disclosure of CSA have increased in psychological research in the past decade findings are often contradictory, and support for common beliefs such as males being more reluctant to disclose than females may not be as strong as assumed. Therefore, in this article we ask the question, “What do we know about gender in the disclosure of child sexual abuse?” We evaluate the degree of validity of reported rates of CSA by examining the methods used to gather epidemiological evidence for CSA. We also provide a critique of two methods commonly used in the study of CSA: prospective and retrospective studies. We conclude by identifying areas to address in future studies concerning gender and CSA.
KEYWORDS:
Acknowledgments
This research was funded in part by the Trauma and Oppression Fund at the University of Oregon Foundation. We thank Carolyn Allard, Nicole Erickson, and Jessica Potter for their assistance with gathering the many relevant sources included in this article and for their helpful feedback.
Notes
Foynes, M. M., Freyd, J. J., & DePrince, A. (2008). Child abuse: Betrayal and disclosure. Manuscript under review.