ABSTRACT
Popularity metrics, such as “likes” are key features in social media (SM). In the political sphere, politicians use popularity metrics as indicators of the extent to which opinions and agendas are widely held by the public. However, popularity metrics have an inherent potential to increase rapidly, making today’s not-so-popular content tomorrow’s potential hit. Hence the lack of popularity indices or their low values may not indicate the full popularity potential of any specific SM content. This is crucial for politicians as they aim to identify and respond to popular public opinions in their constant effort to boost and maintain public support. Considering SM’s ever-growing role in politics, and the significant portion of SM content with no popularity metrics, exploring politicians’ responsiveness to public opinion in SM with and without popularity metrics may shed light on contemporary democratic process and their impact on representation and policy making. Based on Prospect Theory of choice under uncertainty, and the lack of an anchor to base their perception of popularity on, we claim that politicians will be more responsive to public opinion content without “likes” than with “likes.” Findings of a survey-experiment of 100 Israeli politicians support this claim. Possible implications are discussed.
Acknowledgments
Talia Goren was supported by IDIT - PhD Program for Outstanding Social Sciences Researchers, The Herta & Paul Amir Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Haifa.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Correction Statement
This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.
Notes
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Talia Goren
Talia Goren is a PhD candidate who investigates various aspects of public opinion, political responsiveness, political participation and engagement.
Itai Beeri
Itai Beeri is an associate professor and the Head of the Division of Public Administration and Policy. His main research focus lies in spatial inequality, public failure & turnaround strategies, local democracy, urbanism and regionalism, and local networks & entrepreneurship.
Dana R. Vashdi
Dana R. Vashdi is an associate professor and heads the School of Political Sciences. She is an organizational psychologist who specializes in the area of Public Administration and Policy. Her research focuses on factors and conditions that promote learning, creativity and well being of citizens and within teams in the public and private sectors.