“People, Places, and Things:” Network Factors Matter in the Experiences of Mental Health Court Participants

Abstract

Mental health courts (MHC) are expanding nationally but the evidence base involves substantial gaps in research. Although positive outcomes are associated with MHC participation, it is unclear as to what factors contribute to outcomes. The current study addresses gaps in research by exploring the experiences of MHC participants and associations between network factors and treatment adherence from consumers participating in two MHCs (N=80). A mixed-method design drawing from multiple data sources is utilized. Study results suggest network factors are significantly associated with treatment adherence and play an important role in recovery. Results have implications for social work practice and research.

Acknowledgments

This article is based on a portion of the author's dissertation. I graciously thank my committee for all of their assistance with my project. A special thanks to Malitta Engstrom, Amy Watson, Beth Angell, and Julia Henly. This publication was made possible by grant number P20 MH085981 from the National Institute of Mental Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIMH or NIH.

Notes

SSI = Supplemental Security Income; SSDI = Social Security Disability Insurance; MHC = Mental Health Clinic.

^a Categories may not equal 100% due to rounding.

^a Missing data: 1 case.

^b Missing data: 1 case; 58.2% of participants were involved with treatment providers three months or less.

Note. % (n) represents the number of participants who reported at least one network member for the respective variable.

*p < 0.05. **p < 0.01.